The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture
Abstract
Ethnopragmatics starts with the objective of understanding speech practices in terms of the values and social models of cultural insiders. It applies analytical methods based on cross-linguistic semantics in order to access and represent cultural meanings (Wierzbicka 1991[2003]; Goddard/Wierzbicka eds. 2004; Goddard ed. 2006). The chapter explains and positions these characteristics of ethnopragmatics with respect to similar and rival approaches. Ethnopragmatics is anti-Anglocentric, identifying as a critical issue the need to avoid English-specific terminology and English-specific concepts both in cultural description and in theory formulation. Relatedly, an important aspect of the ethnopragmatic project to de-naturalise the pragmatics of Anglo English. The chapter illustrates how cultural scripts and semantic explications framed in simple translatable words can be used to faithfully capture cultural-internal understandings of meaning, while at the same time allowing these to be accessible to cultural outsiders. Ethnopragmatics can be applied at different levels of description, from high-level cultural scripts associated with cultural keywords, to interactional scripts for communicative style, right down to scripts for linguistic routines and other word usage phenomena. It can illuminate connections between cultural values and beliefs, on the one hand, and a wide range of features of language structure and use, such as diminutives and honorifics, systems of address and reference, discourse particles, and of course, language-specific word meanings of diverse kinds. Ethnpragmatics sketches are provided for Chinese and Anglo English. As for future directions, the chapter looks to practical applications of ethnopragmatics in intercultural education and in language documentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Joint attention and early language
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130423 · Cited by 1,822
Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.52.1.45 · Cited by 1,816
Joint Attention and Early Language
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00470.x · Cited by 1,815
Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description
Silverstein, M. C. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,444
Paton, A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1154 · Cited by 1,292
Language input and child syntax
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00500-5 · Cited by 892
(2009) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.4324/9780203875612-10 · Cited by 783
Explanation in linguistics : the logical problem of language acquisition
Hornstein, N., & LIGHTFOOT, D. W. (1981) · Tijdschrift voor Philosophie · Cited by 470
Young minds in social worlds: experience, meaning, and memory
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-0558 · Cited by 330
Culture and language development
(2014) · The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315793993-32 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Deng, S., & Wang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191420 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-12-17
- OpenAlex
- W567651912
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315793993
- The paper
- The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. (2014). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.