Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental Justice and the Sustainable City

Haughton, Graham·2021·The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities

Abstract

This chapter discusses the small number of interlinked principles for sustainable development which derive from these concerns, and then moves on to assess how four different sets of approaches to creating a sustainable city measure up against them. In particular, relative to the other models of sustainable urban development, what the self-reliant city approach adds is a clear emphasis on interspecies equity, procedural equity and also social equity, bringing these to the forefront of both problem diagnosis and the processes of devising policies for the sustainable city. Environmental justice and social justice are seen as intrinsically connected in such analyses, with both treated in this article in this larger conception of addressing both the underlying systemic causes of injustice and the more traditional distributive justice concerns of seeking to redress inequalities of outcome. The concern with procedural equity here also covers what is sometimes referred to as the principle of participation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315800462-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Haughton, G.
Venue
The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2021-12-13
Pages
62-79
OpenAlex
W4206562557
Cited by
297
References
1
FWCI
56.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Justice and the Sustainable City. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315800462-6
The paper
Haughton, G. (2021). Environmental Justice and the Sustainable City. The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800462-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.