The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity
Abstract
Analogical comparisons with simple or familiar systems occur often in people’s descriptions of complex systems, sometimes as explicit analogical models, and sometimes as implicit analogies, in which the person seems to borrow structure from the base domain without noticing it. Phrases like “ current being routed along a conductor,” or “ stopping the flow” of electricity are examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 · Cited by 3,010
The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge
Gallese †, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290442000310 · Cited by 2,726
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863 · Cited by 2,381
The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5 · Cited by 1,454
Keil, F. C. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · Cited by 1,350
Metadata
- Venue
- Mental Models
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2014-01-14
- Pages
- 107-138
- OpenAlex
- W1528369519
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315802725-10
- The paper
- Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity. (2014). Mental Models. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802725-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
