CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 161Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsAcademic Writing and PublishingDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Helping Doctoral Students Write

Kamler, Barbara, Thomson, Pat·2014·Routledge eBooks
DOI 10.4324/9781315813639
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a proven approach to effective doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations. It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing complicated and difficult, but the advice they receive often glosses over the complexities of writing and/or locates the problem in the writer. Kamler and Thomson provide a highly effective framework for scholarly work that is located in personal, institutional and cultural contexts. The pedagogical approach developed in the book is based on the notion of writing as a social practice. This approach allows supervisors to think of doctoral writers as novices who need to learn new ways with words as they enter the discursive practices of scholarly communities. This involves learning sophisticated writing practices with specific sets of conventions and textual characteristics. The authors offer supervisors practical advice on helping with commonly encountered writing tasks such as the proposal, the journal abstract, the literature review and constructing the dissertation argument. The first edition of this book has helped many academics and thousands of research students produce better written material. Now fully updated the second edition includes: Examples from a broader range of academic disciplines A new chapter on writing from the th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315813639

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–161 of 161

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
ORCID
Thomson, Pat
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-03-21
DOI
10.4324/9781315813639
OpenAlex
W4234467415
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.48
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
doctoral writing, thesis writing, doctoral supervision, writing as social practice, academic identity, writing as research, academic community, academic writing style, literature review writing, research proposal writing, abstract writing, note-taking, academic conferences, social media in academia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review