Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Learner English on Computer

Granger, Sylviane·2014·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Computer learner corpus (CLC) research is still in its infancy. With roots both in corpus linguistics and second language acquisition (SLA) studies, it uses the methods and tools of corpus linguistics to gain better insights into authentic learner language. This volume is intended to open up a new field of research to a wider audience and includes articles on all aspects of computer learner corpus research, from the initial stage of corpus compilation to the final stage of pedagogical application. Although the main focus of the book is English as a Foreign Language, the approach could easily be applied to other foreign languages.\nThe book is divided into three main parts. Part 1 is a general outline of learner corpus design and analysis. In the first paper, I first discuss the place of learner corpus research within corpus linguistics, SLA and ELT, and then outline the basic principles underlying learner corpus compilation and computer-aided linguistic analysis of learner data. In the second paper, Fanny Meunier presents the major linguistic software tools, focusing in particular on their relevance for interlanguage studies. \nIn Part 2, the principles outlined in the first part of the book are put into practice through a series of case studies examining various aspects of learner lexis, discourse and grammar.The first three papers analyse learner lexis from a variety of angles: high frequency words (Håkan Ringbom), adjective intensification (Gunter Lorenz) and recurrent word combinations (Sylvie De Cock et al.). The following three papers focus on discourse phenomena: connectors (Bengt Altenberg and Marie Tapper), questions (Tuija Virtanen) and features of reader/writer visibility (Stephanie Petch-Tyson). The research in the last two papers is carried out on tagged corpora and highlights aspects of learner grammar on the basis of the frequencies of individual tags (Sylviane Granger and Paul Rayson) and tag sequences (Jan Aarts and Sylviane Granger). \nPart 3 shows how CLC-based studies can help improve pedagogical tools: EFL grammars (Doug Biber and Randi Reppen), dictionaries (Patrick Gillard and Adam Gadsby), writing textbooks (Przemyslaw Kaszubski) and electronic tools (John Milton). Implications for classroom methodology are highlighted in the last paper (Sylviane Granger and Chris Tribble).\nInterest in learner corpora is growing fast, with both SLA specialists and ELT practicioners beginning to recognize their theoretical and practical value. There is no doubt in my mind that we are on the verge of a learner corpus boom. This volume will serve its purpose if it helps would-be learner corpus builders and analysts to get started in a field of research which is certain to make an important contribution to foreign language learning and teaching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315841342

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Granger, S.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-02-04
OpenAlex
W2040380014
Cited by
349
References
0
FWCI
12.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learner English on Computer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315841342
The paper
Granger, S. (2014). Learner English on Computer. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.