Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication
Abstract
Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication is a lively and accessible introduction for undergraduates who are new to the area of intercultural communication. Incorporating real-life examples from around the world and drawing on current research, this text argues against cultural stereotyping and instead provides students with a skill-building framework to enhance understanding of the complexities of language and intercultural communication in diverse international settings. Readers will learn to understand and become aware of power relations, positioning and the impact of social and political forces on language choice and the intercultural communication process. This is the essential text for undergraduate students studying courses in intercultural communication for the first time. Features include: clear learning objectives to structure your study end of chapter discussion questions to test your knowledge highlighted glossary terms to provide a strong understanding of the relevant vocabulary an array of photos including signs which make use of non-verbal codes and many examples that illustrate such issues as intercultural misunderstandings and the effects of culture shock substantial online resources for students including learning objectives, suggested readings, links to media resources and real-world intercultural scenarios and activities. Additional in-depth instructor resources feature test materials, powerpoints, key terms, extended chapter outlines and sample…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Communication in reference interactions is always imbued with power dynamics shaped by racialized identity and cultural practices.
“In these intimate interactions, communication is always imbued with power dynamics, which are shaped by racialized identity (Hill, 2008;Kochman, 1981) and cultural practices (Jackson, 2014, p. 217;Kubota, 2012).”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Jackson, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jackson, J.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Jane
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-01-10
- OpenAlex
- W4300782484
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- intercultural communication, language and culture, cultural stereotyping, power relations, positioning, language choice, cultural misunderstandings, culture shock, nonverbal communication, signs, international communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review