Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of Peri-Mortem Trauma in Skeletons Recovered From Mass Graves from the Spanish Civil War (1936–9)

Ríos, Luis, García-Rubio, Almudena, Martínez, Berta, Herrasti, Lourdes, Etxeberria, Francisco·2015·The Routledge Handbook of the Bioarchaeology of Human Conflict

Abstract

During the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of people have been victims of extrajudicial executions worldwide, in episodes of violence associated with armed conflicts, political repression and ethnic cleansing (Shelton 2005). From the crimes committed during the Second World War, to the political repression in dictatorial regimes in Latin America (e.g. Chile, Argentina, Guatemala) and east Asia (e.g. Cambodia), to the recent conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, central Africa and the Middle East, in most of these cases the victims of the killings have been illegally buried in clandestine mass graves. In this context, we define a mass grave after the definition provided by the United Nations special rapporteur to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) as a location where three or more bodies are buried, victims of extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions, not having died in combat or armed confrontations (ICTY 1996). In many cases, forensic projects have been organized in order to exhume and identify theremains of the victims from these mass graves. The main immediate objectives of these forensic projects have been the return of the remains to the families and/or the collection of evidence to establish accountability and bring those responsible to justice (although in all cases there should be an ethical and practical commitment for personal identification of the remains). More generally, the information obtained from these projects, toge…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315883366.ch32

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trauma analysis has indicated that most of those who were executed had gunshot wounds to the head, but patterns vary depending on the execution squad and the context (judicial/extrajudicial).

    “Trauma analysis has indicated that most of those who were executed had gunshot wounds to the head, but patterns vary, depending on the execution squad and the context (judicial/extrajudicial) (see Refs. [27,28].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ríos, L., García-Rubio, A., Martínez, B., Herrasti, L., & Etxeberria, F.
Venue
The Routledge Handbook of the Bioarchaeology of Human Conflict
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015
Cited by
0
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review