Cited by 255EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom

Leow, Ronald P.·2015·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom offers a unique five-prong (theoretical, empirical, methodological, pedagogical, and model building) approach to the issue of explicit learning in the L2 classroom from a student-centered perspective. To achieve this five-prong objective, the book reports the theoretical underpinnings, empirical studies, and the research designs employed in current research to investigate the constructs of attention and awareness in SLA with the objectives to (1) propose a model of the L2 learning process in SLA that accounts for the cognitive processes employed during this process and (2) provide pedagogical and curricular implications for the L2 classroom. The book also provides a comprehensive treatise of research methodology that is aimed at not only underscoring the major features of conducting robust research designs with high levels of internal validity but also preparing teachers to become critical readers of published empirical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315887074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on L2 acquisition has focused on noticing, differentiating between detection, awareness, and understanding.

    “This research has tended to focus on the construct of noticing, differentiating between noticing at the level of detection, awareness, and understanding (Leow, 2015; Robinson, 1995).”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Leow, 2015

  • L2 learners need to pay attention to the connections between language form and its meanings in use.

    “Researchers of L2 acquisition have emphasized the need for L2 learners to pay attention to the connections between language form and its meanings in use (e.g., Gass, 2003; Leow, 2015; Long, 1996; Schmidt, 2001).”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Leow, 2015

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leow, R. P.
Corresponding author
Leow, Ronald P.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-02-20
OpenAlex
W4253959128
Cited by
255
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.01
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
explicit learning, second language acquisition, attention, awareness, cognitive processes in language learning, student-centered learning, curriculum implications, research design, internal validity, research critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review