Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom
Abstract
Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom offers a unique five-prong (theoretical, empirical, methodological, pedagogical, and model building) approach to the issue of explicit learning in the L2 classroom from a student-centered perspective. To achieve this five-prong objective, the book reports the theoretical underpinnings, empirical studies, and the research designs employed in current research to investigate the constructs of attention and awareness in SLA with the objectives to (1) propose a model of the L2 learning process in SLA that accounts for the cognitive processes employed during this process and (2) provide pedagogical and curricular implications for the L2 classroom. The book also provides a comprehensive treatise of research methodology that is aimed at not only underscoring the major features of conducting robust research designs with high levels of internal validity but also preparing teachers to become critical readers of published empirical research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on L2 acquisition has focused on noticing, differentiating between detection, awareness, and understanding.
“This research has tended to focus on the construct of noticing, differentiating between noticing at the level of detection, awareness, and understanding (Leow, 2015; Robinson, 1995).”
From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Leow, 2015
L2 learners need to pay attention to the connections between language form and its meanings in use.
“Researchers of L2 acquisition have emphasized the need for L2 learners to pay attention to the connections between language form and its meanings in use (e.g., Gass, 2003; Leow, 2015; Long, 1996; Schmidt, 2001).”
From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Leow, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782 · see citing works
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
“This research has tended to focus on the construct of noticing, differentiating between noticing at the level of detection, awareness, and understanding (Leow, 2015; Robinson, 1995).”
BackgroundIncidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: an eye-tracking study
Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., JOHNSTON, S., Lee, S., Sarkar, A., & Yoon, H. (2017) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000219 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“Again, this finding alludes to the distinction between form and meaning; specifically, to the notion that making a form-meaning connection entails a greater depth of processing than registering the form (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundSato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12283 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Mode in Theoretical and Empirical TBLT Research: Advancing Research Agendas
Gilabert, R., Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000112 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Knowledge processing includes internalization, modification, and consolidation of knowledge (Leow, 2015).”
InfluentialTrends in Language Acquisition Research
Abbot‐Smith, K. (2013) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar · Cited by 98 · see citing works
L1 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION CAN IMPROVE L2 ONLINE AND OFFLINE PERFORMANCE
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. J. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311600022x · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“'Weaker' accounts suggest that learners can use EI to segment or parse the input (Terrell, 1991), notice features (Schmidt, 1990), understand a rule and help production (Leow, 2015), and arrive at correct interpretations with fewer practice items (Henry et al., 2009).”
BackgroundEXPLICIT INSTRUCTION, BILINGUALISM, AND THE OLDER ADULT LEARNER
Cox, J. G. (2015) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000364 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Additionally, receiving EI seems to yield higher levels of TL awareness, which is associated with more successful learning (Leow, 2015; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundKim, H. R., & Bowles, M. A. (2019) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.522 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT INSTRUCTION ON IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT
Godfroid, A. (2015) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000388 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“Even though evidence for implicit adult L2 learning appears to be accruing (see Ellis, 2002 ; Williams, 2009 , for reviews; but DeKeyser, 2003 , and Leow, 2015 , for more cautious positions), many questions remain and warrant an exploration of the topic beyond a narrow focus on whether learning…”
BackgroundCerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000139 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“Online Appendix A, which includes a coded full verbal protocol (reported in Leow, 2015 ), provides an insightful account of the cognitive processes employed by one participant in our GI group, Mark.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLee, M.-J., & Révész, A. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000108 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“, 2015), that is, theymay have differed in degree of cognitive effort, level of analysis, and intake elaboration (Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundMorgan‐Short, K., Marsden, E. J., Heil, J., Issa, B. I., Leow, R. P., Mikhaylova, A., Mikołajczak, S., Moreno, N., Slabakova, R., & Szudarski, P. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12292 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“…the input processing theory (VanPatten, 2015) and other perspectives related to L2 processing (e.g., N. Ellis et al., 2014; N. Ellis & Wulff, 2015; Leow, 2015) may want to explore the boundaries of when learners can attend to form and meaning while processing input for comprehension (see Marsden,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationProactive Language Learning Theory
Papi, M., & Hiver, P. (2024) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12644 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Leow, R. P. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818776674 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“…over incidental and implicit learning, ISLA research may better inform teachers, language curricula, and teaching methodology by focusing on the potential roles either intentional or explicit learning (see also N. Ellis, 2015; Leow, 2015a) may play in promoting more robust learning in this setting.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationKliesch, M., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2021) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12696 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Testing the role of processing speed and automaticity in second language listening
Hui, B., & Godfroid, A. (2020) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716420000193 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“…entail automatic processing because automaticity is conceptualized as qualitatively different from a simple speed-up (i.e., quicker execution of controlled procedures; Hulstijn et al., 2009; Segalowitz, 2010, also see Leow, 2015, for an overview of controlled and automatic processing of the L2).”
MethodNoticing vocabulary holes aids incidental second language word learning: An experimental study
de Vos, J. F., Schriefers, H. J., & Lemhöfer, K. (2018) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000019 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“The positive relationship between depth of processing and learning has long been posited (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Craik & Tulving, 1975) and supported, also for SLA (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001; Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundLeow, R. P. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.05leo · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationLanguage Learning Through Writing: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.015 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Depth of processing in L2 learning: theory, research, and pedagogy
Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Spanish Language Teaching · doi:10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationPromoting Grammatical Development Through Textually Enhanced Captions: An Eye‐Tracking Study
Lee, M.-J., & Révész, A. (2018) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12503 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“However, the lack of significant links between the eye-tracking indices and development in the enhanced group implies that more attention, unless it triggers greater depth of processing, does not necessarily lead to more learning (Godfroid et al., 2013; Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundZalbidea, J. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000261 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ATTENTIONAL MANIPULATIONS ON SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DEVELOPMENT
Issa, B. I., & Morgan‐Short, K. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311800013x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Indeed, at least three theoretical L2 models claim that attention is necessary for L2 development (Leow, 2015; Robinson, 2003; Schmidt, 1990, 1993) and at least one claims that attention is both necessary and sufficient (Tomlin & Villa, 1994).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAssessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges
Nassaji, H. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444819000375 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“While the role of learner attention or the extent to which learners need to be consciously aware of certain linguistic forms in order to learn them is a contentious issue in the field of SLA, many researchers believe that learning cannot occur without some degree of attention to form or noticing (Schmidt, 2001; Dought…”
BackgroundKasprowicz, R., & Marsden, E. J. (2016) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amw051 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“The research above provides evidence that, arguably, aligns with an information processing (skill acquisition) account of learning に that awareness at the level of understanding (Leow 2015) can with practice become proceduralised knowledge, and eventually automatised (DeKeyser 2007).”
BackgroundInput spacing and the learning of L2 vocabulary in a classroom context
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818805251 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
PROCESSING VARIABILITY IN INTENTIONAL AND INCIDENTAL WORD LEARNING
Hui, B. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263119000603 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“In other words, the design of the study did not capture some of the very first lexical processing in the development, measuring only the processing of products of learning, not processing during the learning process (Godfroid, 2019; Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundNicolás‐Conesa, F., Manchón, R. M., & García, M. L. C. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12592 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Adrada-Rafael, S. (2016) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716416000308 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Jung, J., & Révész, A. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263118000165 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Considering that the stimulated recall comments indicate a low level of awareness (Schmidt, 1990) or depth of processing (Leow, 2015), the findings appear to imply that the impact of the reading activity manipulation on learners’ awareness appeared to be only marginal.”
BackgroundLeow, R. P. (2015) · Studies in bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.03leo · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationTorregrossa, J., Eisenbeiß, S., & Bongartz, C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12552 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Using video dubbing to foster college students’ English-speaking ability
Jao, C.-Y., Yeh, H., Huang, W.-R., & Chen, N. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2049824 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…which showed that repetitive revoicing and imitation of authentic contexts enhances learners’ English-speaking ability (He & Wasuntarasophit, 2015; Pamungkas, 2019) together with other studies that have reported the beneficial role of depth of processing in L2 development (Leow, 2015, 2019).”
BackgroundAwareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning
McManus, K. (2019) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2019.1620756 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Although previous research has tended to code awareness based on a single mention of the feature under study (for review, see Leow, 2015), an awareness threshold of 30% of mentions or greater was used to provide a more stringent classification.”
BackgroundMethodLANGUAGE REFLECTION FOSTERED BY INDIVIDUAL L2 WRITING TASKS
López-Serrano, S., de Larios, J. R., & Manchón, R. M. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263119000275 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“This approach should facilitate ending up with a coherent, process-oriented description of the levels of processing involved (Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialNATIVE AND NONNATIVE PROCESSING OF ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SENTENCES
Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311800027x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Leow (2015) sees variable prior knowledge as a limitation on PI research and prefers the participants to have no prior knowledge.”
BackgroundThe emergence of awareness in uninstructed L2 learning: A visual world eye tracking study
Andringa, S. J. (2020) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658320915502 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“The most important indication is probably that implicit learning effects are generally small (Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundAn ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing
Manchón, R. M., & Leow, R. P. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.14man · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Task Motivation to L2 Learning: Understanding Links through Learners' Task Engagement
Hiver, P. V., & Dao, P. (2025) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3410 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The significant role of engagement here also emphasizes the importance of deep processing and active involvement (see also Leow, 2015, 2019) in social situations and emotionally-enhanced task conditions.”
Why haven't we solved instructed SLA? A sociocognitive account
Toth, P. D., & Moranski, K. (2018) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12322 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
What can multi-factors contribute to Chinese EFL learners’ implicit L2 knowledge?
Zhang, R., & Chen, Y. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2024-0021 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“All L2 participants in the current study received classroom instruction that was explicitly form-focused in the earlier stages of L2 learning (Leow 2015).”
Recalde, M. T. B., & Basterrechea, M. (2025) · Second language learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80924-8_1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: is feedback always effective?
Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Providing feedback is hard work for language teachers although most educators and many SLA researchers believe in the value of attention to form in one way or another (e.g. Leow, 2015; Robinson, 2003).”
Backgroundde Larios, J. R., Hernández, F., & Coyle, Y. (2021) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.20008.roc · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Methodological strengths, challenges, and joys of classroom-based quasi-experimental research
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.52.03sat · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Tonkin, K., Page, S., & Forsey, M. (2019) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12412 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lee, J. F., Malovrh, P. A., Doherty, S., & Nichols, A. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820914025 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The criterion of scoring 60% or less on the pretest has been called into question as allowing for participants to have varying amounts of (uncontrolled for) prior knowledge of the target (Leow, 2015, p. 111).”
BackgroundExplicit and Implicit Learning in Second Language Acquisition
VanPatten, B., & Smith, M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009043571 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Perfective -le Use and Consciousness-Raising among Beginner-Level Chinese Learners
Xu, Y. (2020) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages5020016 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback
Manchón, R. M., Nicolás‐Conesa, F., García, M. L. C., & Sánchez, R. C. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.11man · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jung, J., Stainer, M. J., & Tran, H. M. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221129994 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“This decision was made to triangulate eye-fixation data that represent lower-level processes at the level of attention with the participants’ verbal reports that were produced at the level of awareness (Leow, 2015).”
Leow, R. P., Thinglum, A., & Leow, S. A. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“compositions written within the natural writing conditions of a foreign language curriculum were transcribed, coded for depth of processing (DoP) (Leow, 2015), and correlated with subsequent performances on the target items.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe interface of explicit and implicit second-language knowledge: A longitudinal study
Kim, K., & Godfroid, A. (2023) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728922000773 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Where SLA and Language Education Meet: The Transfer from Task-Based Needs Analysis to Task Design
Gilabert, R. (2023) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13101015 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Awareness and learning under incidental learning conditions
Rogers, J. (2017) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2017.1287711 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zalbidea, J., & Sanz, C. (2020) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716420000442 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Beyond these morphosyntactic differences, these target forms were selected because they also differ substantially in terms of intrinsic salience, and thus in the likelihood that they will be noticed and further processed in learners’WM (e.g., N. Ellis, 2017; Leow, 2015; VanPatten, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, M., & Jung, J. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211034640 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“The assumption that underlies textual enhancement is that visually salient target linguistic constructions will attract learners’ attention and, further, increased attention will result in promoting development in the use of L2 knowledge (Leow, 2015).”
Moranski, K., & Zalbidea, J. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12487 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Audio-synchronized textual enhancement in foreign language pronunciation learning from videos
Galimberti, V., Mora, J. C., & Gilabert, R. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103078 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Fukuta, J., & Yamashita, J. (2021) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583211044950 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…countered this hypothesis by demonstrating the existence of learning without awareness, and several subsequent studies have investigated Williams’ contention (e.g. Andringa and Rebuschat, 2015; Bergsleithner et al., 2013; Leow, 2015; Monaghan and Rebuschat, 2019; Rebuschat and Williams, 2012).”
BackgroundLeow, R. P. (2019) · The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0086.pub2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of different forms of explicit instruction on L2 development: A meta‐analysis
Li, F., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12726 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Indrarathne, B., Ratajczak, M., & Kormos, J. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12290 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“This might have involved “cognitive effort, level of analysis, elaboration of intake together with the usage of prior knowledge, hypothesis testing and rule formation” (Leow, 2015, p. 204).”
Effects of written languaging on second language learning: Mediating roles of aptitude
Ishikawa, M., & Suzuki, W. (2023) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12817 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Chan, R., & Leung, J. (2018) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000376 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“This is not surprising because, as noted by Leow (2015), the construct of awareness had not been methodologically and empirically addressed in the field of SLA until the latter part of the 90s.”
BackgroundLázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2023) · Trends in Language Acquisition Research · doi:10.1075/tilar.32 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Peng, C. X., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231214910 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Leow (2015) also underscores the central role of the depth of processing (DoP) during the feedback processing stage, referring to the cognitive effort individuals deploy to process the input via activating prior knowledge, testing hypotheses and forming rules.”
L2 task engagement: A research agenda
Hiver, P. V., Dao, P., & Yamazaki, J. S. (2025) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444825101043 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“‘Learning’ itself can be defined and operationalized in many task-specific ways (Ellis et al., 2020; Larsen-Freeman, 2017; Leow, 2015).”
Are think-alouds reactive? Evidence from an L2 written corrective feedback study
Suh, B.-R. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820967166 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“condition to reflect, rehearse, and better process a morphosyntactic rule, that is, promoting a high depth of processing (Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundTabari, M. A., Sato, M., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231202574 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Comments in the TAPs were categorized into low, medium, or high DoP and calculated using Zamora’s (2017) three-level DoP scoring system, consistent with Leow’s (2012, 2015, 2020) psycholinguistic framework of feedback processing.”
InfluentialFirst language effects on incidental vocabulary learning through bimodal input
The TwiLex Group (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000275 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“On the other hand, learners with higher WM capacities would have the cognitive resources to both avoid the distraction caused by the audio input and effectively use the auditory information to process the words at a deeper level (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Leow, 2015).”
Introduction: A snapshot of thirty-five years of instructed second language acquisition
Han, Z., & Nassaji, H. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818776992 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“However, inquiries into instructed learning seem to have grown into a passion, notably from 1980s onwards (for recent syntheses, see, e.g. Ellis & Shintani, 2013; Leow, 2015; Loewen, 2015; Loewen & Sato, 2017; Long, 2015, 2017; Nassaji, 2016a, 2015; VanPatten, 2017).”
Impact of exercise format and repetition on learning verb–noun collocations
Ferguson, P., Siyanova‐Chanturia, A., & Leeming, P. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211038091 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Therefore, we argue that the results support the premise that explicit teaching and practice (e.g. Leow, 2015) of both form and meaning is essential for learning MWEs.”
Toth, P. D. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12490 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Shao, J., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2019-0131 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Révész, A., Bunting, L., Florea, A., Gilabert, R., Segerstad, Y. H. A., Mihu, I., Parry, C., Benton, L., & Vasalou, A. (2021) · TESOL Quarterly (Print) · doi:10.1002/tesq.3036 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Jung, J., & Lee, M. (2022) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“, I don’t remember it at all; There was no special reason), implying text processing at a relatively lower-level (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Leow, 2015).”
BackgroundMohammadi, K., Jafarpour, A., Alipour, J., & Hashemian, M. (2023) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2022.2157783 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“This kind of research (e.g., Leow, 2015; Robinson & Kiewra, 1995) recognizes gradations of cognitive involvement, with the term engagement being used almost synonymously.”
BackgroundThe noticing hypothesis and formulaic language. Learnability of non-salient language forms
Szcześniak, K. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104372 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hiver, P. V., & Dao, P. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103609 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Task and Syllabus Design for Morphologically Complex Languages
Gilabert, R., & Castellví, J. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.023 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Generative Approach to the Instructed Second Language Acquisition of Spanish se
Juffs, A., & Fang, S.-H. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12483 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jung, J. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820911198 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fujisawa, Y., & Shintani, N. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103765 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Examining Deductive Versus Guided Instruction From an Interactionist Perspective
Azkarai, A., Oliver, R., & Gil‐Berrio, Y. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12482 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bowles, M. A., & Gastañaga, K. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Based on Leow (2020) and past research on the relationship between high DoP and subsequent learning outcomes (Leow, 2015), these are instances that have the greatest potential for leading to learning gains.”
Variation theory in Austrian initial EFL teacher education: potentials and challenges
Gierlinger, E. M., Spann, H., & Wagner, T. (2016) · International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies · doi:10.1108/ijlls-12-2015-0045 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
McManus, K. (2020) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728920000218 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Han, Z.-H. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000282 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
SUZUKI, Y., NAKATA, T., & DEKEYSER, R. (2020) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12625 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kersten, K., Schelletter, C., Bruhn, A.-C., & Ponto, K. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6030124 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhao, J., & Lee, C. I. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836013 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Leow (2015, p. 204) defined this deep processing as “the relative amount of cognitive effort, level of analysis, and elaboration of intake, together with the usage of prior knowledge, hypotheses testing, and rule formation, employed in decoding and encoding some grammatical or lexical information in…”
BackgroundThe effects of incidental focus on form on learning vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation
Pouresmaeil, A., & Vali, M. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231185419 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…levels of accuracy through purely meaning-based instruction has led researchers to propose that some degree of attention to form is necessary in order for language acquisition to take place (e.g. R. Ellis, 2001, 2003; Leow, 2015; Loewen, 2018, 2019; Long, 1991, 2015, 2016; Spada & Lightbown, 2008).”
Rogers, J., & Leow, R. P. (2020) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12621 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationProcessing output during individual L2 writing tasks
López-Serrano, S., de Larios, J. R., & Manchón, R. M. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.10lop · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Leow, R. P. (2018) · The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0086 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationLanguaging and grammatical terminology
Toth, P. D., Moranski, K., Shaffer, A. R., & Mattson‐Prieto, R. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.03tot · Cited by 7 · see citing works
McManus, K. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000270 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“See Leow (2015b) for a review of Ellis and Sagarra (2010) and proposal for a series of conceptual replications focused on”
BackgroundJung, J., Wang, H., Li, W., & Zhang, W. (2022) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2022-0140 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leow, R. P.
- Corresponding author
- Leow, Ronald P.
- ORCID
- Leow, Ronald P.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-20
- OpenAlex
- W4253959128
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- explicit learning, second language acquisition, attention, awareness, cognitive processes in language learning, student-centered learning, curriculum implications, research design, internal validity, research critique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review