The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘Speakers of highest truth’
Abstract
In Chapter 5 , Jessica Frazier argues that some dialogues in the Upaniṣads can be characterised as a collaborative search for broad, over-spanning truths. Seen in this way, these dialogues offer a distinctive Indian model, which focuses on creatively canvassing broad speculative explanations. In relation to the theme of encounter, Frazier characterises this model of dialogue as collaborative, with interlocutors working together, listening to each other and building on each other’s insights to achieve the goal of higher knowledge. Embedded within this model is a critique of the standard modern descriptions of the ‘public sphere’, in which dialogue is often celebrated as a performance of citizenship or a community-building exercise. In the Upaniṣads, in contrast, the goal is to elevate one’s understanding by assimilating diverse views into an encompassing position that is abductively derived from all of them together. In this model of dialogue as idea-building, rather than mere talk, as Frazier describes it, competition is resolved by debate rather than violence because it is the increased explanatory power of an idea that unites theories.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Where Plato used philosophical dialogues to compare his interlocutors ' di ff erent theories, global philosophy ultimately uses ' philosophical plurilogues ' (Frazier ( ) ) to map many possible formulations of each idea or problem onto each other, abstracting core or overarching truths.”
From ‘The view from above’: a theory of comparative philosophy (2020) · cites this paper as Frazier (2019)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
‘The view from above’: a theory of comparative philosophy
FRAZIER, J. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000362 · Cited by 11
Self-citationFrom comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy
Kolesnikov, A. S., & Alieva, C. E. (2022) · Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Philosophy and Conflict Studies · doi:10.21638/spbu17.2022.403 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Frazier, J.
- Corresponding author
- Frazier, Jessica
- ORCID
- Frazier, Jessica
- Venue
- In Dialogue with Classical Indian Traditions
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Pages
- 84-104
- OpenAlex
- W2918352247
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- Upaniṣads, dialogue, collaborative knowledge, encounter, public sphere, abductive reasoning, debate, Indian philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Speakers of highest truth’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351011136-6
- The paper
- Frazier, J. (2019). ‘Speakers of highest truth’. In Dialogue with Classical Indian Traditions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351011136-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.