The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refusing the University
Abstract
This chapter begins with articulating the particularities of settler colonialism and Native elimination. Next, it examines liberal theories of justice as the underlying structure operating within the politics of recognition. The chapter also discusses the academy as an arm of the settler state, which is distinct from other frameworks that critique the academy as fundamentally neoliberal, Eurocentric, and/or patriarchal. Through the discussion of the academy as an arm of the settler state, it argues that this shift opens up more possibilities for coalition and collusion within and outside the university. The chapter then describes the ways in which it refracts settler logics and the politics of recognition. It further examines emergent scholarship on the politics of refusal as a field of possibility for building co-resistance movements between the Black radical and critical Indigenous traditions as well as others committed to refusing the settler state and its attendant institutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The noninclusive, oppressive, and colonizing nature of archaeology is reproduced and compounded by the settler colonial institutions through which it is practiced, including universities, museums, archives, different levels of government, and legislation governing private sector archaeology.
“The noninclusive, oppressive, and colonizing nature of archaeology is reproduced and compounded by the settler colonial institutions through which it is practiced, including universities (Desmarais this issue; Grande 2018), museums (Lonetree 2012;Smith 2011), archives (Griffith 2018), different levels of government (Dent 2019, this issue), and by the legislation that governs private sector”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Grande 2018
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Agathangelou, A. M. , Bassichis, D. , & Spira, T. L. (2008). Intimate investments: Homonormativity, global lockdown, and seductions of empire. Radical History Review , 100 , 120–143. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Grande, S.
- Venue
- Toward What Justice?
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Pages
- 47-65
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review