The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustainability Reporting Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
This chapter presents the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines that reflect the longer history and greater consensus on environmental reporting practices compared to that achieved to date regarding social and economic reporting. The intent of the Guidelines is to provide a sustainability reporting framework that stresses the linkages between the environmental, social and economic aspects of enterprise performance. These Guidelines, presented as an Exposure Draft for comment and pilot testing, are the GRI&s;s first major product. The Exposure Draft of the Guidelines addresses the environmental aspects of sustainability. These Guidelines have been developed for public comment and testing through to the end of 1999. The preamble describes the rationale and underpinnings of the Guidelines, their value and applicability, general reporting principles, and other information on their continuing evolution. The Guidelines attempt to balance flexibility within an overall uniform structure, recognising that, while each reporting entity is unique, sustainability reporting is best served by adherence to certain common elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 · Cited by 1,031
Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems
Fiksel, J. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0344819 · Cited by 831
Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link
Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001 · Cited by 683
Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice
Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018 · Cited by 656
Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.538 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Venue
- Sustainable Measures
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-08
- Pages
- 440-474
- OpenAlex
- W2611471231
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 259.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351283007-24
- The paper
- Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. (2017). Sustainable Measures. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351283007-24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.