The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Politics, Economics, and Welfare
Abstract
For most of this century, the habit of thinking about politics and economics in terms of grand and simple alternatives has exerted a powerful influence over the minds of those concerned with economic organization. Politics, Economics, and Welfare is a systematic attack on the idea of all-embracing ideological solutions to complex economic problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory
Astley, W. G., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392620 · Cited by 1,224
Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399707300703 · Cited by 1,082
Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do
Bozeman, B. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00165 · Cited by 550
Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4 · Cited by 441
(1994) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037204 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-29
- OpenAlex
- W2092966972
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Politics, Economics, and Welfare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351308168
- The paper
- Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (2017). Politics, Economics, and Welfare. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351308168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
