Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges

Open access
Christensen, Tom, Lægreid, Per·2011·Public Organization Review
DOI 10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article provides a greater understanding of hybrid public administration. Different generations of public sector reforms have accentuated hybrid and complex features of public organizations, resulting in multiple-layer structural and cultural features. The article covers the following research questions: 1) how can we interpret the increasing tendency towards hybrid administration in terms of a transformative approach; 2) how is hybrid administration developing out of attempts to balance NPM and post-NPM?; and 3) how can we understand the major mechanisms producing hybridity in a modern reform? The case we focus on is the reform of the Norwegian welfare administration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P.
Venue
Public Organization Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-10-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
407-423
ISSN
  • 1566-7170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7098
DOI
10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
OpenAlex
W2021072222
Cited by
441
References
67
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
The paper
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. Public Organization Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.