The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognition and Instruction
Abstract
Contents: Preface. Part I: Development and Instruction. M. Kalchman, J. Moss, R. Case, Psychological Models for the Development of Mathematical Understanding: Rational Numbers and Function. R. Lehrer, L. Schauble, D. Strom, M. Pligge, Similarity of Form and Substance: Modeling Material Kind. D. Klahr, Z. Chen, E.E. Toth, Cognitive Development and Science Education: Ships that Pass in the Night or Beacons of Mutual Illumination? Part II: Teachers and Instructional Strategies. J. Minstrell, The Role of the Teacher in Making Sense of Classroom Experiences and Effecting Better Learning. A.S. Palincsar, S.J. Magnusson, The Interplay of First-Hand and Second-Hand Investigations to Model and Support the Development of Scientific Knowledge and Reasoning. R. Siegler, Discussion of Parts I and II: Cognition, Instruction, and the Quest for Meaning. H.A. Simon, Keynote Address: Learning to Research About Learning. Part III: Tools for Learning From Instruction. J.R. Anderson, K. Gluck, What Role Do Cognitive Architectures Play in Intelligent Tutoring Systems? B. Reiser, I. Tabak, W.A. Sandoval, B.K. Smith, F. Steinmuller, A.J. Leone, BGuILE: Strategic and Conceptual Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry in Biology Classrooms. A. Lesgold, M. Nahemow, Tools to Assist Learning by Doing: Achieving and Assessing Efficient Technology for Learning. Part IV: Social Contexts of Instruction and Learning. M. Lovett, A Collaborative Convergence on Studying Reasoning Processes: A Case Study in Statistics. S.M. Carver, Cognition and Instruction: Enriching the Laboratory School Experience of Children, Teachers, Parents, and Undergraduates. E.B. Hunt, Discussion of Parts III and IV: Themes in Cognitive Science and Education. Part V: Cognition and Instruction: The Next 25 Years. T. Koschmann, A Third Metaphor for Learning: Toward a Deweyan Form of Transactional Inquiry. P. Cobb, Supporting the Improvement of Learning and Teaching in Social and Institutional Context. S. Wineburg, P. Grossman, Affect and Effect in Cognitive Approaches to Instruction. R. Glaser, General Discussion: Progress Then and Now.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Where's the evidence that active learning works?
Michael, J. (2006) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006 · Cited by 1,648
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1 · Cited by 798
An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development
Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001 · Cited by 706
Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research
Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305018 · Cited by 566
Garfield, J., & Ben‐Zvi, D. (2007) · International Statistical Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2013-06-17
- OpenAlex
- W1511704025
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognition and Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410600257
- The paper
- Cognition and Instruction. (2013). Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.