Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 783

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theories

·2000·Psychology Press eBooks

Abstract

Contents: Preface. R.R. Mowrer, S.B. Klein, The Transitive Nature of Contemporary Learning Theory. A.R. Wagner, S.E. Brandon, A Componential Theory of Pavlovian Conditioning. J.C. Denniston, H.I. Savastano, R.R. Miller, The Extended Comparator Hypothesis: Learning by Contiguity, Responding by Relative Strength. R.A. Rescorla, Experimental Extinction. W. Timberlake, Motivational Modes in Behavior Systems. R.M. Church, K. Kirkpatrick, Theories of Conditioning and Timing. A.G. Baker, R.A. Murphy, F. Vallee-Tourangeau, R. Mehta, Contingency Learning and Causal Reasoning. B.W. Balleine, Incentive Processes in Instrumental Conditioning. G. Hall, Perceptual Learning: Association and Differentiation. A. Tomie, Autoshaping and Drug-Taking. N. DeSousa, F. Vaccarino, Neurobiology of Reinforcement: Interaction Between Dopamine and Cholecystokinin Systems. V.M. LoLordo, T.L. Taylor, Effects of Uncontrollable Aversive Events: Some Unsolved Puzzles. A.L. Riley, G.R. Simpson, The Attenuating Effects of Drug Preexposure on Taste Aversion Conditioning: Generality, Experimental Parameters, Underlying Mechanisms, and Implications for Drug Use and Abuse. D.J. Levis, K.E. Brewer, The Neurotic Paradox: Attempts by Two-Factor Fear Theory and Alternative Avoidance Models to Resolve the Issues Associated With Sustained Avoidance Responding in Extinction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781410600691

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 783

Metadata

Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Published
2000-10-01
OpenAlex
W17423371
Cited by
783
References
0
FWCI
15.01
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410600691
The paper
Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theories. (2000). Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.