The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design
Abstract
Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design is a handbook of task analysis and knowledge elicitation methods that can be used for designing direct instruction, performance support, and learner-centered learning environments. To design any kind of instruction, it is necessary to articulate a model of how learners should think and perform. This book provides descriptions and examples of five different kinds of task analysis methods: *job/behavioral analysis; *learning analysis; *cognitive task analysis; *activity-based analysis methods; and *subject matter analysis. Chapters follow a standard format making them useful for reference, instruction, or performance support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Instructional Systems
Romiszowski, A. J. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9780203063446 · Cited by 449
Rossett, A. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 312
The role of context in learning and instructional design
Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299526 · Cited by 277
Self-citationFiguring Things Out: A Trainer's Guide To Needs And Task Analysis
Zemke, R., & Kramlinger, T. (1982) · Cited by 104
Automating instructional design : concepts and issues
Spector, J. M., Polson, M. C., & Muraida, D. J. (1993) · Educational Technology Publications eBooks · Cited by 93
Arom, S., & Ligeti, G. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511518317.021 · Cited by 76
McCombs, B. L. (1986) · Cited by 30
Cited by
Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504994 · Cited by 494
Self-citationGerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Cierniak, G. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9096-1 · Cited by 130
Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction
Reinbold, S. (2013) · Medical Reference Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/02763869.2013.806859 · Cited by 97
A Schema-Based Instructional Design Model for Self-Paced Learning Environments
Jung, E., Lim, R., & Kim, D. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12040271 · Cited by 46
Ask Systems: interrogative access to multiple ways of thinking
Jonassen, D. H. (2011) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9179-9 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- OpenAlex
- W599890814
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410602657
- The paper
- Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1998). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
