The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education
Abstract
The Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education is based on results from an NSF-supported project (REC 9450510) aimed at clarifying the nature of principles that govern the effective use of emerging new research designs in mathematics and science education. A primary goal is to describe several of the most important types of research designs that: * have been pioneered recently by mathematics and science educators; * have distinctive characteristics when they are used in projects that focus on mathematics and science education; and * have proven to be especially productive for investigating the kinds of complex, interacting, and adapting systems that underlie the development of mathematics or science students and teachers, or for the development, dissemination, and implementation of innovative programs of mathematics or science instruction. The volume emphasizes research designs that are intended to radically increase the relevance of research to practice, often by involving practitioners in the identification and formulation of the problems to be addressed or in other key roles in the research process. Examples of such research designs include teaching experiments, clinical interviews, analyses of videotapes, action research studies, ethnographic observations, software development studies (or curricula development studies, more generally), and computer modeling studies. This book's second goal is to begin discussions about the nature of appropriate and productive criteria for assessing (and increasing) the quality of research proposals, projects, or publications that are based on the preceding kind of research designs. A final objective is to describe such guidelines in forms that will be useful to graduate students and others who are novices to the fields of mathematics or science education research. The NSF-supported project from which this book developed involved a series of mini conferences in which leading researchers in mathematics and science education developed detailed specifications for the book, and planned and revised chapters to be included. Chapters were also field tested and revised during a series of doctoral research seminars that were sponsored by the University of Wisconsin's OERI-supported National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. In these seminars, computer-based videoconferencing and www-based discussion groups were used to create interactions in which authors of potential chapters served as "guest discussion leaders" responding to questions and comments from doctoral students and faculty members representing more than a dozen leading research universities throughout the USA and abroad. A Web site with additional resource materials related to this book can be found at https://www.soe.purdue.edu/smsc/lesh/ This internet site includes directions for enrolling in seminars, participating in ongoing discussion groups, and submitting or downloading resources which range from videotapes and transcripts, to assessment instruments or theory-based software, to publications or data samples related to the research designs being discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
Designing for Productive Failure
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.591717 · Cited by 674
Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2 · Cited by 159
Exploring Two Teacher Education Online Learning Designs: A Classroom of One or Many?
Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2008) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2008.10782517 · Cited by 79
Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding?
Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.11.004 · Cited by 76
Johnson, H. L. (2015) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9590-y · Cited by 58
Generalizations of third and fifth graders within a functional approach to early algebra
Pinto, E., & Cañadas, M. C. (2021) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/s13394-019-00300-2 · Cited by 61
Prospective elementary teachers use of representation to reason algebraically
Richardson, K., Berenson, S., & Staley, K. (2009) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 32
Molina, M., & Mason, J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/14926150903191885 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-10-12
- OpenAlex
- W1494762377
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.