Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 515

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice

·1999·Psychology Press eBooks

Abstract

Contents: J.A. Horvath, Preface: Tacit Knowledge in the Profession. Part I:Law. G. Marchant, J. Robinson, Is Knowing the Tax Code All It Takes to Be a Tax Expert? On the Development of Legal Expertise. E.B. Spaeth, Jr., What a Lawyer Needs to Learn. Part II:Military Command. J.A. Horvath, G.B. Forsythe, R.C. Bullis, P.J. Sweeney, W.M. Williams, J.A. McNally, J.A. Wattendorf, R.J. Sternberg, Experience, Knowledge, and Military Leadership. W.F. Ulmer, Jr., Military Learnings: A Practitioner's Perspective. Part III:Medicine. V.L. Patel, J.F. Arocha, D.R. Kaufman, Expertise and Tacit Knowledge in Medicine. J.J. Cimino, Development of Expertise in Medical Practice. Part IV:Management. C. Argyris, Tacit Knowledge in Management. N.G. Hatsopoulos, G.N. Hatsopoulos, The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Management. Part V:Sales. R.K. Wagner, H. Sujan, M. Sujan, C.A. Rashotte, R.J. Sternberg, Tacit Knowledge in Sales. S. Gregory, Tacit Knowledge in Sales: A Practitioner's Perspective. Part VI:Teaching. B. Torff, Tacit Knowledge in Teaching: Folk Pedagogy and Teacher Education. J. Minstrell, Expertise in Teaching. R.J. Sternberg, Epilogue--What Do We Know About Tacit Knowledge? Making the Tacit Become Explicit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781410603098

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Published
1999-02-01
OpenAlex
W2032458483
Cited by
515
References
0
FWCI
4.54
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.