Cited by 2,057Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and PerformanceLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

The dynamics of proactivity at work

Grant, Adam M., Ashford, Susan J.·2008·Research in Organizational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Employees are increasingly expected to find proactive ways to meet organizational objectives, and managers rely on employee initiative to job craft.

    “At a time when employees are increasingly expected to find proactive ways to meet organizational objectives and contribute the best of their talents to their organizations, managers are more likely than ever to rely on the initiative employees take to job craft (e.g., Crant, 2000;Grant & Ashford, 2008;Frese & Fay, 2001;Parker, Williams, & Turner, 2006).”
  • Thriving serves as an internal gauge for self-regulation, leading individuals to act agentically and proactively, which can improve performance.

    “With thriving used as an internal gauge for self-regulation, individuals behave agentically and proactively by taking responsibility and the initiative to control their destiny, respectively, which can, in turn, enhance performance (Grant & Ashford, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Adam M.
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Pages
3-34
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081888575
Cited by
2,057
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 187 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 67
FWCI
78.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Keywords
proactive behavior, integrative theory, situational antecedents, psychological mechanisms, theory development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review