The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course
Abstract
The intent of this chapter is to provide a selective overview of current second language acquisition (SLA) research. I begin by presenting several approaches to SLA, including formal linguistics, sociolinguistics/sociocultural theory and psycholinguistics. I then consider the roles of input, interaction, feedback and output as they relate to the acquisition of second language knowledge. The goal of this latter part is to show how this view of acquisition (the Input/Interaction/Output (IIO) approach) allows researchers to take into account a number of concepts which are necessary for understanding how second language learning takes place. In particular, I consider the role of attention as it relates to second language (L2) learning, particularly in the context of input, interaction, feedback and output. [See Vihman, Saxton and Peters, this volume for discussions of the role of attention in first language acquisition: SFC.]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning
Lantolf, J. P. (2013) · Cited by 3,849
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS
Corder, S. P. (1967) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 · Cited by 2,466
(2006) · Cited by 2,315
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
(1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,045
Cited by
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003 · Cited by 858
Form‐Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated?
SPADA, N., & LIGHTBOWN, P. M. (2008) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x · Cited by 396
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x · Cited by 341
Acquisition of Japanese as a Foreign Language Through a Baseball Video Game
deHaan, J. W. (2005) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02492.x · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Gass, S. M., Behney, J., Plonsky, L., Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2295936843
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 24.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410604651
- The paper
- Gass, S. M., Behney, J., Plonsky, L., Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.