The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learning difficulty of a linguistic feature depends on a number of variables, including frequency in the input, perceptual salience, communicative redundancy, the relative transparency of a form-meaning mapping, and formal complexity.
“Learning difficulty of a linguistic feature depends on a number of variables, including frequency in the input, perceptual salience, communicative redundancy, the relative transparency of a form-meaning mapping, and formal complexity (DeKeyser, 2005).”
From The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction (2024) · cites this paper as DeKeyser, 2005
Citations
Cites
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge?
Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264 · Cited by 526
Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state
Lardiere, D. (1998) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765898674105303 · Cited by 472
Discourse Motivations for Some Cognitive Acquisition Principles
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1994) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100012845 · Cited by 346
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 93
- 10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50018-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00217.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00577.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263198004021 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263199003010 · DOI
- Bardovi‐Harlig K., 2000, Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use
- 10.1017/S0272263101002042 · DOI
- Birdsong D., 1992, Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition, Language, 68, 706, 10.1353/lan.1992.0035 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263102003042 · DOI
- Celce‐Murcia M., 1999, The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00177 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/sibil.7 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/9.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00421.x · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 · DOI
- Ellis R., 1990, Instructed second language acquisition
- 10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01073.x · DOI
- Gass S. M., 2001, Second language acquisition. An introductory course, 10.4324/9781410604651 · DOI
- 10.1006/cogp.1997.0654 · DOI
- Han Z., 2000, Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo‐passive, Applied Linguistics, 21, 55
- Hansen L., 2001, What counts in the acquisition and attribution of numeral classifiers?, JALT Journal, 23, 90, 10.37546/JALTJJ23.1-5 · DOI
- 10.1075/lald.21 · DOI
- 10.1191/0267658303sr224oa · DOI
- Huang C.‐T., 1982, Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar
- 10.1111/0023-8333.00024 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263101002029 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00257.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263102003029 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716404001298 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8 · DOI
- 10.1191/0267658303sr225oa · DOI
- 10.1177/026765839601200203 · DOI
- 10.1177/136216889800200202 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00284.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263198004045 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-67385-6 · DOI
- Krashen S. D., 1982, Principles and practice in second language acquisition
- Lardiere D., 2000, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, 102
- Larsen‐Freeman D., 2003, Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring
- Larsen‐Freeman D., 1991, An introduction to second language acquisition research
- 10.1111/0023-8333.00169 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263103000020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.009 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263102001018 · DOI
- Long M. H., 1997, Fossilization: Rigor mortis in living linguistic systems?
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch16 · DOI
- Long M. H., 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 15
- Long M. H., 1984, Interlanguage, 253
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005 · DOI
- MacWhinney B., Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches
- 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00010-9 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716400000382 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716400003064 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263101002030 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263103000159 · DOI
- 10.1191/026765800666966395 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.112 · DOI
- Pesetsky D., 1987, The representation of indefiniteness, 98
- 10.1017/S0272263100005015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch20 · DOI
- Pinker S., 1989, Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure
- 10.1191/026765800677556046 · DOI
- Reed J. M., 1998, Handbook of implicit learning, 261
- 10.1515/9783110883718 · DOI
- 10.1191/026765800672262975 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100014674 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0023-8333.21997002 · DOI
- 10.1075/lllt.2.13rob · DOI
- Salaberry R., 2000, The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish
- 10.1191/026765800670666032 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263101002066 · DOI
- 10.1075/lald.19.04spr · DOI
- Stockwell R. P., 1965, The grammatical structures of English and Spanish
- 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01083.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00400.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716400008663 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728904001178 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100009177 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00203 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00205 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410610195 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263102004035 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263199001011 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263101003023 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716401003010 · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.10.07you · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000708 · Cited by 271
Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658308098995 · Cited by 203
Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study
COLLINS, L., TROFIMOVICH, P., WHITE, J., CARDOSO, W., & HORST, M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x · Cited by 158
Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax
Ammar, A. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168807086287 · Cited by 141
The role of language processing in language acquisition
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.5.4.01phi · Cited by 123
Age effects in L2 grammar processing as revealed by ERPs and how (not) to study them.
Meulman, N., Wieling, M., Sprenger, S. A., Stowe, L. A., & Schmid, M. S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143328 · Cited by 60
The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction
Roehr‐Brackin, K., Baranowska, K., Pavlekovic, R., & Scheffler, P. (2024) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12963 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- DeKeyser, R. M.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-15
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0023-8333
- 1467-9922
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review