Cited by 20Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Effects of Chlorella in Hypertensive Men.

Open access
INOUE, Kiyoshi, MUKAIYAMA, Yoshio, OKA, Hiroshi, SANSAWA, Hiroshi·1995·Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi

Abstract

非薬物療法で経過観察可能と判断された軽症ないし境界域一次性高血圧患者23名を対象にした, クロレラの投与試験を実施した。患者のうちクロレラの摂取を理解し積極的に協力してくれた13名に, 他養的に純粋培養したクロレラを毎日1.5g, 6カ月間投与した (クロレラ群)。他の10名は生活指導のみによる経過観察とした (対照群)。両群の高血圧症関連の諸臨床症候の推移を観察し, 以下の結果を得た。1) クロレラ群は, 摂取3カ月後から収縮期血圧および拡張期血圧が有意に低下した。試験前値に比べ6カ月後の血圧下降度は, 収縮期血圧が14.1±1.9mmHg, 拡張期血圧が6.3±1.8mmHgであった。「降圧薬の臨床評価方法に関するガイドライン」に示された降圧度判定基準によると, クロレラ群13例中3例が「下降」, 5例が「下降傾向」, 5例が「不変」であった。一方, 対照群では, 試験期間中血圧の有意な変化は見られなかった。2) クロレラ摂取の前後に行ったアンケート調査から, 高血圧症関連の愁訴の減少と全体的な体調の改善が見られた。3) クロレラの摂取による副作用は, アンケート調査, 臨床検査から認められなかった。以上の結果から, クロレラの摂取は軽症の高血圧症の改善に有効であることが示唆された。

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4327/jsnfs.48.485

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term supplementation with Chlorella (approximately 1.5 g/day for up to six months) reduces blood pressure in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive adults, with enhanced effects reported for GABA-enriched formulations.

    “Similarly, long-term supplementation with Chlorella (approximately 1.5 g/day for up to six months) has been shown to reduce blood pressure in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive adults, with enhanced effects reported for GABA-enriched formulations [77,78].”

    From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [77]

    The study summary and results report that 1.5 g/day of Chlorella for six months lowered blood pressure in men with mild or borderline hypertension. The paper does not report an enhanced effect from GABA-enriched formulations, and its findings do not establish the effect in adults generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
INOUE, K., MUKAIYAMA, Y., OKA, H., & SANSAWA, H.
Affiliations
Yakult Central Institute (JP)
Venue
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
Published
1995
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
485-489
ISSN
  • 0287-3516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1883-2849
OpenAlex
W2328408082
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
ja
Open access
Locations
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
Chlorella, hypertension, essential hypertension, dietary supplementation, blood pressure reduction, non-pharmacological treatment, men, lifestyle advice, adverse effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review