Indigenous environmental knowledge and climate change adaptation
Abstract
Certain climate change impacts are now unavoidable. The importance of adapting to climate change impacts has become increasingly clear, particularly at the local and regional scales. Many entities are looking to community-based adaptation as a place-based response, and a vehicle for empowering individuals, families and peoples. In regions across the world, including the Pacific, an appeal to indigenous environmental knowledge (IEK) is also emerging. This chapter explores the possible integration of IEK into the laws governing climate change adaptation.Integration of IEK, in the adaptation context, describes at least two different phenomena. It describes the indigenous methods used to respond to historical extremes that climate forecasts portend with greater frequency and severity – such as floods and drought – and suggests proven adaptations. It can also describe a lens, or worldview, with which decisions should be made that might facilitate long-range, multigenerational adaptive governance.While there have been multi-scalar efforts to support IEK methods on an ad hoc basis, few have attempted to harmonize core indigenous worldviews with discrete methods used in the Western context. In other words, Western researchers and practitioners generally investigate and employ specific management strategies without also exploring and introducing the relevant worldviews that have fostered such strategies. Moreover, there has been even less discussion of how to integrate these worldview…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ignoring the spiritual dimensions of traditional knowledge can create significant impediments to equitable partnerships.
“These so-called constructs are often at the core of indigenous identity and underpin their beliefs and practices, and ignoring them can create significant impediments to equitable partnerships (Burkett 2013).”
From Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation (2013) · cites this paper as Burkett 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0850-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burkett, M.
- Corresponding author
- Burkett, Maxine
- ORCID
- Burkett, Maxine
- Venue
- Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2013-01-31
- OpenAlex
- W2255071735
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 28.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- traditional ecological knowledge, climate change adaptation, community-based adaptation, climate change law, indigenous worldview, adaptive governance, climate resilience, water resources management, public trust doctrine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review