Cited by 35Islamic Finance and Banking StudiesMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can Islamic banking increase financial inclusion?

Open access
Ben Naceur, Sami, Barajas, Adolfo, Massara, Alexander·2017·Handbook of Empirical Research on Islam and Economic Life

Abstract

Financial inclusion has become an increasingly important concern for a vast number of countries worldwide. At the same time, a fast-growing amount of literature has emerged to examine its measurement, determinants and impacts. Governments have made the promotion of it a priority. For example, the World Bank’s 2014 Global Financial Development Report (GFDR), devoted to financial inclusion, reports that more than two-thirds of regulatory and supervisory agencies have been tasked with encouraging financial inclusion, and more than 50 countries have set formal targets. Last year, the World Bank President announced a global target of universal financial access by 2020. Defined as the share of the population who use financial services, financial inclusion has proven to be linked to desirable economic outcomes above and beyond those associated with the more familiar concept of financial depth. In this chapter, we analyse the existing country-level information on both financial inclusion and the penetration or presence of Islamic banking in order to ascertain the extent to which Islamic banking has contributed to financial inclusion. This chapter tests for a possible financial inclusion of Islamic banking relationships across a wide variety of measures. Our findings suggest a weak and tentative evidence of Islamic banking’s positive impact on some types of inclusion. This weakness in the results may be partially related to data issues, including the limited coverage of Islamic banking indicators and of financial inclusion indicators among the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781784710736.00017

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Ben Naceur, S., Barajas, A., & Massara, A.
Venue
Handbook of Empirical Research on Islam and Economic Life
Published
2017-01-27
OpenAlex
W3125683373
Cited by
34
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
43.23
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
Islamic banking, financial inclusion, financial inclusion indicators, access to finance, financial depth, cross-country analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review