Cited by 31Environmental Sustainability in BusinessHuman Resource and Talent ManagementCorporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability

Sustainable HRM: a comparative and international perspective

Aust, Ina, Muller-Camen, Michael, Poutsma, Erik·2018·Handbook of Research on Comparative Human Resource Management

Abstract

This chapter brings a comparative and institutional perspective to the emergent concept of Sustainable HRM, which links corporate social responsibility (CSR) and human resource management (HRM). Sustainable HRM is defined as the adoption of HRM strategies and practices that enable the achievement of financial, social, and ecological goals, with an impact inside and outside of the organisation and over a long-term time horizon while controlling for unintended side effects and negative feedback. The authors suggest that there may not be a universal version of sustainable HRM, but that different national institutional environments lead to the emergence of different models. Some of these are more conducive to develop sustainability in HRM, whereas others mean that it is more challenging for the HRM function to achieve environmental, social, and human sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781784711139.00026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HRM research largely recognizes the importance of context, but the Sustainable HRM literature has mostly neglected its influence.

    “Although HRM research largely recognizes the importance of context (Cooke, 2018), the Sustainable HRM literature has mostly neglected its influence (for an exception, see Aust, Muller-Camen, & Poutsma, 2018;Ehnert et al., 2014).”

    From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Aust, Muller-Camen, & Poutsma, 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aust, I., Muller-Camen, M., & Poutsma, E.
Venue
Handbook of Research on Comparative Human Resource Management
Published
2018-04-27
OpenAlex
W2886914429
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • WU Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Keywords
sustainable human resource management, corporate social responsibility, institutional theory, environmental sustainability, social sustainability, human sustainability, long-term goals, unintended side effects, human resource management practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review