The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theories of the policy process
Open accessAbstract
This chapter provides an overview of general theoretical approaches to the policy process, and discusses how they may help to describe and interpret processes in the media and communication field. The six approaches discussed are: punctuated equilibrium theory, advocacy coalition framework, veto player theory, multiple streams approach, narrative policy framework and the media policy field approach. None of these approaches is a ‘silver bullet’, but they provide a useful variety of analytical tools and explanatory models, and many can also be combined. Although media policy processes have distinct traits compared to other areas, general theories are still appropriate for their analysis. Engaging with holistic theories that aim to explain change at an overall level may help to advance media policy research. Moving beyond particular policy areas and subfields will increase the understanding of political, cultural and technological change in media and communication policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 · Cited by 2,254
Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Ostrom, E. (2011) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x · Cited by 1,719
Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399713481601 · Cited by 1,514
A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Markham, C., & Bartholomew, L. K. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155 · Cited by 1,137
Metadata
- Authors
- Steen-Johnsen, K., & Schanke Sundet, V.
- Venue
- Handbook of Media and Communication Governance
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2024-07-23
- Pages
- 100-111
- OpenAlex
- W4400906565
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 439.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theories of the policy process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781800887206.00016
- The paper
- Steen-Johnsen, K., & Schanke Sundet, V. (2024). Theories of the policy process. Handbook of Media and Communication Governance. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887206.00016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.