A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective coordination is not automatic in polycentric systems, and poor coordination can undermine trust and reduce legitimacy.
“Effective coordination is not automatic in polycentric systems (Lieberman, 2011;Pahl-Wostl, 2009), and poor coordination can undermine trust and reduce legitimacy.”
From Collective action in a polycentric water governance system (2018) · cites this paper as Pahl-Wostl, 2009
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It has been derived from the even more popular concept of double-loop learning developed by Argyris and Schön (1978). The triple-loop learning concept aims at a refinement of the influence of governing variables in terms of governing assumptions and governing values.”
MethodGeels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 4× · see citing works
“What is required may be called a diagnostic approach taking into account complexity in a systematic fashion (Pahl-Wostl, 1995; Ostrom, 2007; Young, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialCommand and control and the pathology of natural resource management
Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x · Cited by 2,049 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons
Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12212 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Toward mountains without permanent snow and ice
Huss, M., Bookhagen, B., Huggel, C., Jacobsen, D., Bradley, R. S., Clague, J. J., Vuille, M., Buytaert, W., Cayan, D. R., Greenwood, G., et al. (2017) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2016ef000514 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Life's Bottleneck: Sustaining the World's Phosphorus for a Food Secure Future
Cordell, D., & White, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-010213-113300 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Resilience and why it matters for farm management
Darnhofer, I. (2014) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbu012 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Huntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., & Kranz, N. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Self-citationAdaptive capacity: Exploring the research frontier
Mortreux, C., & Barnett, J. (2017) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.467 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Jakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Collective action in a polycentric water governance system
Baldwin, E., McCord, P., Dell'Angelo, J., & Evans, T. (2018) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1810 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufrêne, M., König, A., & Barnaud, C. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09843-230112 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Perevochtchikova, M., De la Mora-De la Mora, G., Hernández Flores, J. Á., Marín, W., Langle Flores, A., Ramos Bueno, A., & Rojo Negrete, I. A. (2019) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100900 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Rossing, W. A. H., Albicette, M. M., Aguerre, V., Leoni, C., Ruggia, A., & Dogliotti, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103103 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The Perspectives of the Urban Poor in Climate Vulnerability Assessments—The Case of Kota, India
Wilk, J., Jonsson, A. C., Rydhagen, B., Rani, A., & Kumar, A. (2018) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2017.08.004 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The German Permaculture Community from a Community of Practice Perspective
Ulbrich, R., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051241 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationA framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs
Chapman, S. (2014) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pahl-Wostl, C.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 354-365
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165299260
- Cited by
- 2,254
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 214 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 145 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 48.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- adaptive capacity, multi-level governance, triple-loop learning, societal learning, informal networks, climate change adaptation, water governance, non-state actors, bureaucratic hierarchy, multi-level interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review