Makna Kurikulum Merdeka bagi Guru dan Siswa: Pendekatan Fenomenologis
Open accessAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pemaknaan Kurikulum Merdeka sebagaimana dipahami oleh 10 guru dan 40 siswa sekolah dasar (SD) yang berlokasi di Kecamatan Buleleng. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang dikolaborasikan dengan metode fenomenologi. Dalam penelitian difokuskan pada pengalaman subjektif para pelaku pendidikan dalam menerapkan kurikulum tersebut. Data diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik wawancara yang dilakukan secara mendalam dilengkapi dengan observasi partisipatif, dan juga analisis dokumen. Kemudian data yang diperolah dilakukan analisis secara mendalam dengan menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian ini berhasil mengungkap tiga tema utama yang saling berkaitan satu sama lain. Pertama, Kurikulum Merdeka dimaknai sebagai ruang kebebasan pedagogis yang memberi fleksibilitas dalam mendesain pembelajaran yang sesuai konteks dan realitas siswa. Kedua, pelaksanaannya masih berhadapan dengan tantangan, terutama terkait keterbatasan pemahaman konsep, minimnya pelatihan, serta kesiapan yang belum merata. Ketiga, kurikulum ini mendorong pergeseran relasi antara guru dan siswa menuju pola interaksi yang lebih setara, dialogis, dan manusiawi. Temuan ini menunjukkan, bahwa makna Kurikulum Merdeka tidak bersifat tunggal, melainkan dipengaruhi oleh pengalaman, konteks institusional, dan dinamika sosial di ruang kelas. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya dukungan sistemik dan refleksi pedagogis dalam memastikan implementasi kurikulum yang bermakna dan berkelanjutan di SD Kecamatan Buleleng.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The learning process in elementary schools is often one-way (teacher-centered), with students acting as passive recipients of information.
“However, the reality on the ground shows that the learning process is often one-way (teacher-centered), with students acting more as passive recipients of information (Dahlan et al., 2025;Sanjiartha et al., 2025).”
From Show and Tell Learning Method Based on the Discovery Learning Model: Creativity and Learning Outcomes at Primary School (2025) · cites this paper as Sanjiartha et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nur, Z., Mulyadi, M., & Nurdiansyah, E. (2025) · ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review · doi:10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4350 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sanjiartha, I. G. D., Sudarsana, I. K., & Dewi, N. P. C. P.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar (ID)
- Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan (ID)
- Venue
- Widya Accarya
- Publisher
- Universitas Dwijendra
- Published
- 2025-10-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-126
- ISSN
- 2085-0018 (ISSN-L)
- 2722-8339
- OpenAlex
- W4415721536
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Widya Accarya (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Education Systems and Policies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- Merdeka Curriculum, curriculum implementation, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, elementary school, freedom of teaching, teacher-student relationship, teacher training needs, pedagogical reflection, Buleleng
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review