Cited by 165Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Writing and PublishingHealth Sciences Research and Education

JBI Reviewer's Manual PDF

Aromataris, Edoardo, Munn, Zachary·2020·JBI eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46658/jbirm-20-02

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data charting followed a standardized data extraction form and allowed for refinements according to information emerging during the review stage.

    “Data charting followed a standardized data extraction form [38] and allowed for refinements according to information emerging during the review stage, as the iterative process of data extraction in scoping reviews is conducive to this [39].”
  • Critical appraisal was conducted using JBI critical appraisal tools appropriate for each study design.

    “Critical appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools appropriate for each study design [14].”
  • Data analysis was primarily descriptive, using frequency counting and a descriptive qualitative approach with basic coding for retrieved qualitative studies.

    “Data analysis was primarily descriptive in nature, as scoping reviews are exploratory and aim to identify the extent of current available evidence and summarize it, rather than synthesize results [32,39]. Along with frequency counting, a descriptive qualitative approach was favored for retrieved qualitative studies, using basic coding of data to organize these into categories, focusing on identify”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z.
Venue
JBI eBooks
Publisher
JBI
Published
2020
OpenAlex
W3034528076
Cited by
165
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.46
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JBI eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review