Cited by 5Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A Multicase Study Exploring Women’s Narratives of Infertility: Implications for Counselors

Open access
Born, Staci, Carotta, Christin, Ramsay-Seaner, Kristine·2018·The Qualitative Report

Abstract

Infertility affects 6.7 million women in the United States (Chandra, Copen, & Stephen, 2013). Women’s experiences with infertility are not only influenced by biological health factors, but also by social, cultural, and personal variables. Given the prevalence and complexity of infertility, additional research is needed to further examine the nuances of women’s experiences. The purpose of this multicase study, as informed by four individual cases, was to explore how women construct their infertility narratives. Review of reflective journals found five common elements: (1) Emotional Rollercoaster, (2) Mind-Body (Dis)Connection, (3) Secret Identity, (4) Supportive vs. Constrained Communication Patterns, and (5) Fatalistic- vs. Agency-Oriented Coping. Increasing our understanding of the whole experience of infertility, beyond the biological diagnosis, is essential to decreasing stigma and increasing the quality of healthcare services available for women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3510

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alizadeh, T., Faraahani, M. N., Shahrarai, M., & Alizadegan, S. H. (2005). The relationship between self-esteem and locus-of-control with infertility-related stress of unrelated infertile men and women. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 6 (2), 194-204.
  2. Born, S. L., & Preston, J. J. (2016). The fertility problem inventory and infertility-related stress: A case study. The Qualitative Report, 21 (3), 497-520. Retrieved from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss3/5/
  3. Ceballo, R., Graham, E. T., & Hart, J. (2015). Silent and infertile: An intersectional analysis of the experiences of socioeconomically diverse African American women with infertility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39 (4), 497-511.
  4. Chandra, A., Copen, C. E., Stephen, E. H. (2013). Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth (Report No. 67). Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics website: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988820
  5. Covington, S. H., & Burns, L. H. (2006). Infertility counseling: A comprehensive handbook for clinicians, (2 nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Domar, A. D., Zuttermeister, P. C., & Friedman, R. (1993). The psychological impact of infertility: A comparison with patients with other medical conditions. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14 , 45-52.
  7. Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Matos, M. (2013). The mediator role of emotion regulation processes and infertility-related stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 20, 497-507.
  8. Gibson, D. M., & Myers, J. E. (2002). The effect of social coping resources and growthfostering relationships on infertility stress in women. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 24 (1), 68-80.
  9. Gourounti, K., Anagnostopoulos, F., & Vaslamatzis, G. (2010). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory in a sample of infertile women undergoing fertility treatment. Midwifery, 27 (5), 660-667.
  10. Greil, A. L., McQuillan, J., Lowry, M., & Shreffler, K. M. (2011). Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. Women. Social Science & Medicine, 73 (1), 87-94.
  11. Grimmet, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of Research in Education 18 (1), 385-456.
  12. Hurd-Clarke, L., Martin-Matthews, A., & Matthews, R. (2006). The continuity and discontinuity of the embodied self in infertility. Canadian Review of Sociology, 43 (1), 95-113.
  13. Jacob, M. C., McQuillan, J., & Greil, A. I. (2007). Psychological distress by type of fertility barrier. Human Reproduction, 22 (3), 885-894.
  14. Martins, M. V., Peterson, B. D., Almeida, V. M., & Costa, M. E. (2011). Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on women's infertility-related stress. Human Reproduction, 26 (8), 2113-2121.
  15. Miles, L. M., Keitel, M., Jackson, M., Harris, A., & Licciardi, F. (2009). Predictors of distress in women being treated for infertility. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27 (3), 238-257.
  16. Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. (2013). Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99 (1), 63.
  17. Sexton, M. B., Byrd, M. R., O'Donohue, W. T., & Jacobs, N. N. (2010). Web-based treatment for infertility-related psychological distress. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 13 (4), 347-358.
  18. Shapiro, C. H. (2009). Therapy with infertile heterosexual couples: It's not about gender - Or is it? Clinical Social Work Journal, 27 , 140-149.
  19. Spector, A. R. (2004). Psychological issues and interventions with infertile patients. Women & Therapy, 27 (3-4), 91-105.
  20. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  21. Tufford, L. (2011). Helping couples through the crisis of infertility. Psychologica, 33 (1), 2430.
  22. Watkins, K. J., & Baldo, T. D. (2004). The infertility experience: Biopsychosocial effects and suggestions for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82 (4), 394-402.
  23. Williams, L., Edwards, T. M., Patterson, J., & Chamow, L. (2011). Essential assessment skills for couple and family therapists . New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Metadata

Authors
Born, S., Carotta, C., & Ramsay-Seaner, K.
Affiliations
  • South Dakota State University (US)
  • South Dakota State University
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Published
2018-12-10
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
OpenAlex
W2905381117
Cited by
5
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
infertility, women's experiences, emotional experience, mind-body problem, secret identity, communication patterns, coping, fatalism, agency, stigma, infertility counseling, quality of care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multicase Study Exploring Women’s Narratives of Infertility: Implications for Counselors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3510
The paper
Born, S., Carotta, C., & Ramsay-Seaner, K. (2018). A Multicase Study Exploring Women’s Narratives of Infertility: Implications for Counselors. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3510