Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research
Open accessAbstract
Framework analysis and applied qualitative research can be a perfect match, in large part because framework analysis was developed for the explicit purpose of analyzing qualitative data in applied policy research. Framework analysis is an inherently comparative form of thematic analysis which employs an organized structure of inductively- and deductively-derived themes (i.e., a framework) to conduct cross-sectional analysis using a combination of data description and abstraction. The overall objective of framework analysis is to identify, describe, and interpret key patterns within and across cases of and themes within the phenomenon of interest. This flexible and powerful method of analysis has been applied to a variety of data types and used in a range of ways in applied research. Framework analysis consists of two major components: creating an analytic framework and applying this analytic framework. This paper details the five steps in framework analysis (data familiarization, framework identification, indexing, charting, and mapping and interpretation) through conducting secondary analysis on this special issue’s common dataset. This worked example adds to the existing framework analysis methodology literature both through describing the analysis specifics and through highlighting the importance of multiple considerations of units of analysis. This paper also includes reflection on the myriad reasons that framework analysis is valuable for applied research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The researchers adopted framework analysis, a form of directed content analysis wherein researchers first familiarise themselves with the data, develop an analytical framework, and subsequently index data according to this framework.
“Consequently, we adopted framework analysis (Ritchie and Spencer, 2002; Goldsmith, 2021), a form of directed content analysis wherein researchers first familiarise themselves with the data, develop an analytical framework, and subsequently index data according to this framework.”
From Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Goldsmith, 2021
Cites
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865 · see citing works
Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach
Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligence
Sarkar, A., & Drosos, I. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.23253 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Consequently, we adopted framework analysis (Ritchie and Spencer, 2002; Goldsmith, 2021), a form of directed content analysis wherein researchers first familiarise themselves with the data, develop an analytical framework, and subsequently index data according to this framework.”
Nield, L., Bhanbhro, S., Steers, H., Young, A., & Fowler Davis, S. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11182499 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goldsmith, L.
- Affiliations
- Southeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldsmith, Laurie
- ORCID
- Goldsmith, Laurie
- Venue
- The Qualitative Report
- Publisher
- Nova Southeastern University
- Published
- 2021-06-20
- ISSN
- 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-3715
- OpenAlex
- W3180597552
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 89.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- framework analysis, analytical framework, thematic analysis, indexing, charting, unit of analysis, policy research, secondary analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review