Cited by 493Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSociology and Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A Guide to Abductive Thematic Analysis

Open access
Thompson, Jamie·2022·The Qualitative Report

Abstract

Thematic analysis is an increasingly popular method for analysing qualitative data within the social sciences. Current guides for conducting thematic analysis promote the method’s broad flexibility across research designs, which has resulted in criticism that the method lacks the rigour and structure necessary for credible academic research. Recognizing the challenges faced by qualitative scholars, I developed and present an 8-step prescriptive approach specific to abductive methodologies incorporating many concepts from seminal works in thematic analysis, and importantly maintaining the balance of theorising with empirical data, which is the core of abductive research.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents an 8-step prescriptive guide for conducting abductive thematic analysis, balancing empirical data with extant theory. It argues this structured approach addresses criticisms of thematic analysis as lacking rigour while remaining specific to abductive research designs.

Key findings

  • Proposes an 8-step process: transcription and familiarisation, coding, codebook, development of themes, theorising, comparison of datasets, data display, and writing up.
  • Abductive thematic analysis should produce latent themes, with theorising as a distinct step where existing theory guides but does not determine explanation; theory can be refined, changed, adapted, or consolidated when data do not fit.
  • Recommends at least 2–3 rounds of coding and a codebook with label, definition, “when to use”/“when not to use” criteria, and an example quotation; thematic network analysis can show how themes derive from codes.
  • Uses examples from the author’s research on ski resort employees and volunteer tourism, including consolidating “fun” and “exciting” codes into “enjoyable work” and combining Bourdieu’s practice theory with Blumer’s symbolic interactionism.

Methods

  • Conceptual/methodological paper, not an empirical study; develops an 8-step guide initially during the author’s PhD and refined through the author’s own research and teaching.
  • Integrates concepts from thematic analysis (e.g., codebook from Guest et al., 2012; thematic network analysis from Attride-Stirling, 2001) with seminal abductive research principles.
  • Illustrates steps with examples from the author’s prior studies, including ski resort employees and volunteer tourism projects.

Limitations

  • The paper states it is not a one-size-fits-all or flexible method for all thematic analysis; it is tailored specifically to abductive research methodologies.
  • The paper notes that advocates of reflexive/inductive thematic analysis have disregarded the codebook as positivistic, and that quantification of qualitative data is often impossible and unnecessary for exploratory conceptual understanding.
  • Evident from the text: the guide is based on the author’s experience and selected examples rather than systematic empirical validation or comparison with other abductive thematic analysis guides.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation

Verify all 17 references — free account

Show all 6 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 2
10 of 10
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Guides for abductive research designs are lacking.

    “Yet, guides for abductive research designs are lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is limited discussion of an abductive approach to thematic analysis in the qualitative research literature.

    “Yet, there is limited discussion of an abductive approach to thematic analysis in the qualitative research literature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coding is a cyclical act, as the first round of coding rarely succeeds in identifying all codes.

    “Coding is a cyclical act, as the first round of coding rarely succeeds in identifying all codes and, therefore, it is recommended to undertake at least 2-3 rounds of coding.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When abductively analysing data, often reviewers will question if an academic has over-reached and whether theoretical contributions are truly representative of the raw data.

    “When abductively analysing data, often reviewers will question if an academic has over-reached and whether theoretical contributions are truly representative of the raw data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Even within top-ranked journals, data displays are often constructed simply using shape and arrow tools available within MS Word.

    “However, even within top-ranked journals, data displays (such as that shown in Figure 3) are often constructed simply using shape and arrow tools available within MS Word”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthropology (pp. 81-93).
  2. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organisational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
  3. Jonsen, K., Fendt, J., & Point, S. (2017). Convincing qualitative research: What constitutes persuasive writing? Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 30-67.
  4. Morse, J. M. (1994). "Emerging from the data": The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23-43). SAGE.
  5. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13.
  6. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3 rd ed.). SAGE.
  7. Seidel, J., & Kelle, U. (1995). Different functions of coding in the analysis of textual data. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 52-61). SAGE.
  8. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 492

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, J.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Jamie
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Published
2022-05-20
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
OpenAlex
W4280585239
Cited by
493
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 6
FWCI
195.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
abductive research, thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, scientific rigor, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review