Die altägyptischen Hohlmaße
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prevalent Egyptian conceptualization of the moon as an eye (the Horus-eye, wedjat-eye, or left eye), documented from the earliest periods, is based on a similar structural correspondence, following the myth of Horus, whose eye was injured by his rival Seth and subsequently healed by Thoth.
“The prevalent Egyptian conceptualization of the moon as an eye (the Horus-eye, wedjat-eye, or left eye), documented from the earliest periods, is based on a similar structural correspondence, following the myth of Horus, whose eye was injured by his rival Seth and subsequently healed by Thoth (Gräßler 2017: 305-313;Pommerening 2005: 241-244, 253-257;Stadler 2012: 40-41, 57-62).”
From Conceptualizations of the Moon (2024) · cites this paper as Pommerening 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualizations of the Moon
Altmann-Wendling, V. (2024) · UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology · doi:10.5070/g9.3924 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pommerening, T.
- Corresponding author
- Pommerening, Tanja
- ORCID
- Pommerening, Tanja
- Venue
- Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks
- Publisher
- FELIX MEINER VERLAG
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W4411875868
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
- Keywords
- ancient Egyptian metrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
