Cited by 60Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Teaching MethodsProblem and Project Based Learning

Constructing Multiple Choice Questions as a Method for Learning

Open access
Palmer, Edward, Devitt, Peter·2006·Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore

Abstract

Introduction: Many different strategies exist to try and encourage students to increase their knowledge and understanding of a subject. This study was undertaken to measure the effect of student-based construction of multiple choice questions (MCQs) as a stimulus for the learning and understanding of topics in clinical surgery. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out at the University of Adelaide, Australia and had 2 components. Fourth-year students were required to provide a case study during a surgical attachment and half of the group was asked to supplement this with MCQs. These students were pre- and post-tested and the effect of the additional intervention (MCQ-construction) measured. Fifth-year students were polled on their preferred methods of learning before and after a learning exercise in which they were asked to undertake a case presentation and create some MCQs. Results: The MCQ questions designed by the students were of a high standard and clearly displayed an understanding of the topic concerned. The 4th-year students in the MCQ construction group showed equivalent outcomes as the case study control group. Students initially ranked MCQ-construction amongst the least stimulating methods of learning, but after the exercise their opinion was significantly more favourable, although still much less than traditional learning methodologies (tutorials, books). Conclusions: Construction of MCQs as a learning tool is an unfamiliar exercise to most students and is an unpopular learning strategy. However, students are capable of producing high quality questions, and the challenge for medical faculties is how best to use this initiative to the students’ advantage. Key words: Educational measurement, Educational models, Medical students

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v35n9p604

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student-generated multiple choice questions can enhance higher-order cognitive and metacognitive skills in disciplines such as medicine, biochemistry, and engineering.

    “student-generated multiple choice questions (MCQs) can enhance higher-order cognitive and metacognitive skills in disciplines such as medicine, biochemistry, and engineering (Bottomley & Denny, 2011; Palmer & Devitt, 2006; Yu & Liu, 2008).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Palmer & Devitt, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, E., & Devitt, P.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Palmer, Edward
Venue
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Published
2006-09-15
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
604-608
ISSN
0304-4602 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W67149822
Cited by
60
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
student-generated questions, medical students, case-based learning, case presentation
MeSH terms
Australia, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Humans, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review