Cited by 34Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Singapore Malay and Tamil Versions of the EQ-5D

Open access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt and evaluate the validity of the Singaporean Malay and Tamil versions of the EQ-5D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EQ- 5D was cross-culturally adapted and translated using an iterative process following standard guidelines. Consenting adult Malay- and Tamil-speaking subjects at a primary care facility in Singapore were interviewed using a questionnaire (including the EQ-5D, a single item assessing global health, the SF-8 and sociodemographic questions) in their respective language versions. Known-groups and convergent construct validity of the EQ-5D was investigated by testing 30 a priori hypotheses per language at attribute and overall levels. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 94 Malay and 78 Indian patients (median age, 54 years and 51 years, respectively). At the attribute level, all 16 hypotheses were fulfilled with several reaching statistical significance (Malay: 4; Tamil: 5). At the overall level, 42 of 44 hypotheses related to the EQ-5D/ EQ-VAS were fulfilled (Malay: 22; Tamil: 20), with 21 reaching statistical significance (Malay: 9; Tamil: 12). CONCLUSION: In this study among primary care patients, the Singapore Malay and Tamil EQ-5D demonstrated satisfactory known-groups and convergent validity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v36n6p403

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 8. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2003. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wee, H.-L., Loke, W.-C., Li, S.-C., Fong, K.-Y., Cheung, Y.-B., Machin, D., Luo, N., & Thumboo, J.
Affiliations
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
  • SingHealth Polyclinics (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Thumboo, Julian
Venue
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
403-408
ISSN
0304-4602 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321361192
Cited by
34
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
EQ-5D, cross-cultural adaptation, health-related quality of life, known-groups validity, convergent validity, EQ-VAS, primary care patients, Singapore
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Female, Health Status, Humans, India, Language, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Singapore, Cohort Studies, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review