Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graduate Students' Confidence Level and Dimensions of Anxiety in Doing Empirical Studies in the 21st Century: a Convergent-Parallel Exploration

Bulusan, Ferdinand, Bautista, Tomas C., Pascual, Sabina B., Respicio-Pascual, Venus, Garcia, Perfecta B.·2025·Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the relationship between graduate students' confidence in conducting empirical research and their research-related anxiety. It aims to examine how anxiety affects research productivity and academic progression in a research-intensive institution in Northern Luzon, Philippines. Theoretical Framework: Anchored in research self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997) and academic anxiety theories (Zeidner, 1991), this study explores how confidence and anxiety interact in the research process, influencing motivation, persistence, and research performance. Method: A convergent-parallel mixed methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 495 graduate students via a validated survey, while qualitative insights were derived from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 28 participants. Statistical analyses examined confidence variations, while thematic analysis explored anxiety-related challenges. Results and Discussion: Findings indicate that while students report high confidence in research competencies, they experience anxiety linked to methodological uncertainty, lack of mentorship, time constraints, fear of criticism, and perfectionism. Statistical analysis shows that confidence varies by research experience but not by demographic factors. Thematic findings highlight institutional and psychological barriers that exacerbate anxiety. Research Implications: This study underscores the need for structured research training, mentorship, and institutional support to bridge the gap between perceived and actual research efficacy. Originality/Value: By challenging the assumption that confidence equates to competence, this study provides insights into managing research anxiety and enhancing graduate students’ research preparedness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe05799

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Blondé, J., De Clercq, M., Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (2024). The role of self-efficacy and perfectionism in the academic adjustment of first-year university students. Educational Psychology, 44(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  2. Chen, Y., Watson, R., & Hilton, A. (2017). An exploration of the structure of nursing students' self-efficacy in performing research. Nurse Education Today, 49, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  3. Cokley, K., McClain, S., Enciso, A., & Martinez, M. (2013). An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 41(2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx · DOI · Paper page
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Fook, C. Y., Sidhu, G. K., & Narasuman, S. (2017). Research experience and research competency: Exploring postgraduate students' perceptions. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 247-275. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  6. Gadsby, J. (2021). Impostor phenomenon among doctoral students: The role of gender, race, and resilience. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  7. Kumar, S., Kailasapathy, P., & Mudiyanselage, R. (2022). Mentoring and research self-efficacy: The role of academic culture and gender. Studies in Higher Education, 47(5), 1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  8. Lacson, E. E., & Dejos, E. A., Jr. (2022). Research skills scale for senior high school students: Development and validation. International Journal of Educational Research & Innovation, 20(3), 56-72. https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/379.pdf
  9. Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2021). The impact of language barriers on academic self-efficacy and academic performance: A study of international students in South Korea. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1042-1056. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  10. Martinez, E., & Nguyen, J. (2018). The role of peer support in the development of research self-efficacy and research productivity among graduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 59(4), 486-491. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx · DOI
  11. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  12. Perepiczka, M., Chandler, N., & Becerra, M. (2011). Relationship between graduate students' statistics self-efficacy, statistics anxiety, attitude toward statistics, and social support. The Professional Counselor, 1(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx · DOI
  13. Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2016). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 180-190. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  14. Tigranyan, K., Karapetyan, L., & Grigoryan, K. (2021). Research self-efficacy and anxiety among graduate students: The mediating role of research motivation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  15. Xu, H., & Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of research training on graduate students' research self-efficacy and research anxiety: A longitudinal study. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 14(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
  16. Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Gao, Y. (2023). Employment situations, AI-generated content tools, and research self-efficacy: A study of female graduate students. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx

Metadata

Authors
Bulusan, F., Bautista, T. C., Pascual, S. B., Respicio-Pascual, V., & Garcia, P. B.
Venue
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
e05799
ISSN
2965-730X
Cited by
0
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.