Cited by 3Innovations in Medical EducationCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsEmergency Medicine Education and Research

Impact and Challenges to the Neurology Residency Training in The Medical City During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access
Kimberly C. Geronimo, Genica Lynne C. Maylem, Mark Anthony J. Sta. Maria, Veeda Michelle M. Anlacan, Roland Dominic G. Jamora·2021·Acta Medica Philippina

Abstract

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic presented an extraordinary challenge to the operations of private hospitals involved in neurological residency training. Numerous adaptations were made to restructure the hospital, including the special units and diagnostic centers. Teaching and training activities were swiftly transitioned to online platforms and research activities were streamlined. Manpower allocation into teams with active duties followed by mandatory quarantine periods became the norm. Objective. To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the neurology training program by comparing two periods: pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Methods. We reviewed the changes implemented by the hospital in response to the pandemic. We also looked into our residency training program pre-pandemic and the subsequent changes instituted to adapt to the pandemic. Results. Due to the community quarantine imposed by the government, there was a drastic drop by as much as 70.5% in the out-patient census, 38.4% in the in-patient census, and 46.9% in neurodiagnostic (electroencephalography and electrodiagnostic medicine). The residents were reorganized into three teams of 4 residents, further divided into COVID and non-COVID rotations for 5 days straight duty. Consultants were also stratified into high-risk (on-call for emergency referrals in a work-from-home scheme) and non-high-risk (COVID patient rounds). Teleconsultation was likewise utilized. Academic activities were shifted to blended online learning. Conclusion. There was a need to reorganize resident staffing brought about by the hospital changes as well, to ensure safety during the pandemic. The pandemic has forced us to shift to alternative methods of teaching and examination, such as teleneurology. Regular assessments and adjustments to the training program will need to be done to adapt to an evolving situation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47895/amp.vi0.2299

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurology residents who received off days were those who had worked in critical COVID-19 areas.

    “Neurology residents who were given off days were those who rendered services in critical COVID-19 areas [8].”

    From Burnout among neurology residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes active-duty periods followed by mandatory quarantine, and Challenges Adaptations (page unavailable) says residents were assigned to both COVID and non-COVID posts. The paper does not say that off days were given specifically to residents who worked in critical COVID-19 areas. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]4. Espiritu AI, Sy MC, Anlacan VM, Jamora RD. The Philippine COVID-19 Outcomes: a Retrospective study Of Neurological manifestations and Associated symptoms (The Philippine CORONA Study): a protocol study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040944.
  2. [7]7. Wechsler LR, Tsao JW, Levine SR, Swain-Eng RJ, Adams RJ, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Teleneurology applications: report of the Telemedicine Work Group of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;80(7):670-676.
  3. [12]12. Tolu LB, Feyissa GT, Ezeh A, Gudu W. Managing resident workforce and resident workforce and residency training during COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review of adaptive approaches. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:527-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geronimo, K. C., Maylem, G. L. C., Maria, M. A. J. S., Anlacan, V. M. M., & Jamora, R. D. G.
Affiliations
  • The Medical City Ortigas (PH)
  • Philippine General Hospital (PH)
Venue
Acta Medica Philippina
Published
2021
ISSN
  • 0001-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 2094-9278
OpenAlex
W3168452961
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Medica Philippina (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, neurology residency, private hospitals, hospital restructuring, teleconsultation, teleneurology, online medical education, community quarantine, EEG, electrodiagnostic medicine, mandatory quarantine, working from home

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review