Cited by 10Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

A Literature Review and Research Agenda on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Open access
Kalyanathaya, Krishna Prakash, K., Krishna Prasad·2022·International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters

Abstract

Purpose: When Artificial Intelligence is penetrating every walk of our affairs and business, we face enormous challenges and opportunities to adopt this revolution. Machine learning models are used to make the important decisions in critical areas such as medical diagnosis, financial transactions. We need to know how they make decisions to trust the systems powered by these models. However, there are challenges in this area of explaining predictions or decisions made by machine learning model. Ensembles like Random Forest, Deep learning algorithms make the matter worst in terms of explaining the outcomes of decision even though these models produce more accurate results. We cannot accept the black box nature of AI models as we encounter the consequences of those decisions. In this paper, we would like to open this Pandora box and review the current challenges and opportunities to explain the decisions or outcome of AI model. There has been lot of debate on this topic with headlines as Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Interpreting ML models, Explainable ML models etc. This paper does the literature review of latest findings and surveys published in various reputed journals and publications. Towards the end, we try to bring some open research agenda in these findings and future directions. Methodology: The literature survey on the chosen topic has been exhaustively covered to include fundamental concepts of the research topic. Journals from multiple secondary data sources such as books and research papers published in various reputable publications which are relevant for the work were chosen in the methodology. Findings/Result: While there are no single approaches currently solve the explainable ML model challenges, some model algorithms such as Decision Trees, KNN algorithm provides built in interpretations. However there is no common approach and they cannot be used in all the problems. Developing model specific interpretations will be complex and difficult for the user to make them adopt. Model specific explanations may lead to multiple explanations on same predictions which will lead to ambiguity of the outcome. In this paper, we have conceptualized a common approach to build explainable models that may fulfill current challenges of XAI. Originality: After the literature review, the knowledge gathered in the form of findings were used to model a theoretical framework for the research topic. Then concerted effort was made to develop a conceptual model to support the future research work. Paper Type: Literature Review.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47992/ijaeml.2581.7000.0119

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalyanathaya, K. P., & K., K. P.
Affiliations
  • Srinivas University (IN)
  • College of Computer Science and Information Science, Srinivas University, Mangalore, India
Venue
International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters
Published
2022-02-08
Pages
43-59
ISSN
2581-7000 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210843907
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
explainable AI, model interpretability, black-box models, trust in AI, ensemble learning, decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, conceptual framework, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review