A Literature Review and Research Agenda on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: When Artificial Intelligence is penetrating every walk of our affairs and business, we face enormous challenges and opportunities to adopt this revolution. Machine learning models are used to make the important decisions in critical areas such as medical diagnosis, financial transactions. We need to know how they make decisions to trust the systems powered by these models. However, there are challenges in this area of explaining predictions or decisions made by machine learning model. Ensembles like Random Forest, Deep learning algorithms make the matter worst in terms of explaining the outcomes of decision even though these models produce more accurate results. We cannot accept the black box nature of AI models as we encounter the consequences of those decisions. In this paper, we would like to open this Pandora box and review the current challenges and opportunities to explain the decisions or outcome of AI model. There has been lot of debate on this topic with headlines as Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Interpreting ML models, Explainable ML models etc. This paper does the literature review of latest findings and surveys published in various reputed journals and publications. Towards the end, we try to bring some open research agenda in these findings and future directions. Methodology: The literature survey on the chosen topic has been exhaustively covered to include fundamental concepts of the research topic. Journals from multiple secondary data sources such as books and research papers published in various reputable publications which are relevant for the work were chosen in the methodology. Findings/Result: While there are no single approaches currently solve the explainable ML model challenges, some model algorithms such as Decision Trees, KNN algorithm provides built in interpretations. However there is no common approach and they cannot be used in all the problems. Developing model specific interpretations will be complex and difficult for the user to make them adopt. Model specific explanations may lead to multiple explanations on same predictions which will lead to ambiguity of the outcome. In this paper, we have conceptualized a common approach to build explainable models that may fulfill current challenges of XAI. Originality: After the literature review, the knowledge gathered in the form of findings were used to model a theoretical framework for the research topic. Then concerted effort was made to develop a conceptual model to support the future research work. Paper Type: Literature Review.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regulators in many countries demand greater transparency and explainability of decisions in the financial sector by requiring XAI rather than AI-based systems.
“Besides, regulators in many countries demand greater transparency and explainability of decisions in the financial sector by requiring XAI rather than AI-based systems (Kalyanathaya 2022).”
From Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literature (2024) · cites this paper as Kalyanathaya 2022
Cites
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423 · see citing works
Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922 · see citing works
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 · Cited by 1,328 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[61] 2021 In this paper, a framework of XAI approach is introduced to train and classify deep learning-based medical image analysis methods.”
MethodExplainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review
Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1424 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Human- versus Artificial Intelligence
Korteling, J. E. (., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.622364 · Cited by 619 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Robotics is a branch of AI dealing with movement of computer controlled systems [1][2][3].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weber, P., Carl, K. V., & Hinz, O. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00320-0 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“Besides, regulators in many countries demand greater transparency and explainability of decisions in the financial sector by requiring XAI rather than AI-based systems (Kalyanathaya 2022).”
- Authors
- Kalyanathaya, K. P., & K., K. P.
- Affiliations
- Srinivas University (IN)
- College of Computer Science and Information Science, Srinivas University, Mangalore, India
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters
- Publisher
- Srinivas University
- Published
- 2022-02-08
- Pages
- 43-59
- ISSN
- 2581-7000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210843907
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- explainable AI, model interpretability, black-box models, trust in AI, ensemble learning, decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, conceptual framework, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review