The DOI matches its DataCite record.
open2chat – eine digitale Peer-to-Peer-Begleitung für Jugendliche. Theoretische Zugänge und praktische Lösungen
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-designed eHealth for adolescents appears to be associated with a more engaging and satisfying user experience.
“Co-designed eHealth for adolescents appears to be associated with a more engaging and satisfying user experience [34-37].”
From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
The Introduction describes open2chat as a digital support tool developed with substantial direct involvement of its adolescent target group. The Abstract calls the internet familiar and attractive to young people and says user feedback informs improvements. Neither passage establishes that co-design is associated with a more engaging or satisfying user experience. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fischer-Grote, L., Fössing, V., Aigner, M., Fehrmann, E., & Boeckle, M. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/46637 · Cited by 42
Zechner, K. A., Wiesner, C., & Böckle, M. (2022) · schule verantworten | führungskultur_innovation_autonomie · doi:10.53349/sv.2022.i4.a278 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmalwieser, S., Jesser, A., Mädge, A.-L., Schrank, B., & Böckle, M.
- Affiliations
- Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
- Venue
- Universität für Weiterbildung Krems & e-beratungsjournal.net
- Publisher
- Universität für Weiterbildung Krems & e-beratungsjournal.net
- Published
- 2022
- OpenAlex
- W6891716212
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- DOOR
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- peer support, adolescents, digital peer support, youth mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
