Two Dimensional Kodaira-Spencer Theory and Three Dimensional Chern-Simons Gravity
Open accessAbstract
Motivated by the six dimensional formulation of Kodaira-Spencer theory for Calabi-Yau threefolds, we formulate a two dimensional version and argue that this is the relevant field theory for the target space of local topological B-model with a geometry based on a Riemann surface. We show that the Ward identities of this quantum theory is equivalent to recursion relations recently proposed by Eynard and Orantin to solve the topological B model. Our derivation provides a conceptual explanation of this link and reveals a hidden affine SL(2,R) symmetry. Moreover we argue that our results provide the strongest evidence yet of the existence of topological M theory in one higher dimension, which in this case can be closely related to SL(2,R)Chern-Simons formulation of three dimensional gravity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feynman diagrammatics with the cubic vertex in (5.29) allows one to write down recursive Dyson-Schwinger relations that match with Eynard-Orantin's topological recursion relations.
“Feynman diagrammatics with the cubic vertex in (5.29) allows one to immediately write down recursive Dyson–Schwinger relations that can be shown to match with Eynard–Orantin’s topological recursion relations (Dijkgraaf and Vafa 2007).”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Dijkgraaf and Vafa 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system
Witten, E. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [1][1] M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino and C. Vafa, 'The topological vertex,' Commun. Math. Phys. 254 , 425 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0305132]. - · arXiv
- [2][2] R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, 'Matrix models, topological strings, and supersymmetric gauge theories,' Nucl. Phys. B 644 , 3 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0206255]. - · arXiv
- [3][3] B. Eynard and N. Orantin, 'Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion,' [arXiv:math-ph/0702045]. - · arXiv
- [4][4] V. Bouchard, A. Klemm, M. Marino and S. Pasquetti, 'Remodeling the B-model,' [arXiv:hep-th/07091453]. -
- [5][5] B. Eynard, M. Marino and N. Orantin, 'Holomorphic anomaly and matrix models,' JHEP 0706 , 058 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0702110]. - · arXiv
- [6][6] M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, 'Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes,' Commun. Math. Phys. 165 , 311 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9309140]. - · arXiv
- [8][8] R. Dijkgraaf, 'Chiral deformations of conformal field theories,' Nucl. Phys. B 493 , 588 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9609022]. - · arXiv
- [10][10] E. Frenkel, 'Lectures on Wakimoto modules, opers and the center at the critical level,' [arXiv:math.QA/0210029]. - · arXiv
- [12][12] E. Witten, 'Quantum background independence in string theory,' [arXiv:hepth/9306122]. -
- [13][13] R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and M. Vonk, 'On the partition sum of the NS five-brane,' [arXiv:hep-th/0205281]. - · arXiv
- [16][16] R. Dijkgraaf, S. Gukov, A. Neitzke and C. Vafa, 'Topological M-theory as unification of form theories of gravity,' Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 , 603 (2005) [arXiv:hepth/0411073]. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland
McNamara, J., & Vafa, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.06738 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dijkgraaf, R., & Vafa, C.
- ORCID
- Vafa, Cumrun
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 0711.1932
- OpenAlex
- W1891266735
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Keywords
- Kodaira-Spencer theory, topological B-model, Calabi-Yau threefolds, two-dimensional field theory, Riemann surfaces, Ward identities, three-dimensional gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review