Citation Counting, Citation Ranking, and h-Index of Human-Computer Interaction Researchers: A Comparison between Scopus and Web of Science
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR--a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially if citations in conference proceedings are sought and that h scores should be manually calculated instead of relying on system calculations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inaccurate references affect the intellectual impact of scientists, journals and disciplines and may hinder individual development.
“Thus, inaccurate references affect the intellectual impact of scientists, journals and disciplines and may hinder individual development”
From How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals? (2016) · cites this paper as Meho & Rogers, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The rise and rise of citation analysis
Meho, L. I. (2007) · Physics World · doi:10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [5]5. Top 42 sources of citations by database (1996-2007) -The figures in the Scopus, Web of Science, and the Union of Scopus and Web of Science columns refer to the number of citations found in each journal or conference proceeding to the works of the 22 researchers. -The figures in the Scopus IF and JCR IF columns refer to the citing sources' 2006 impact factor scores. -NA = Not available. -Items in bold are those citing journals and conference proceedings covered exclusively in Scopus. -LNCS stands for the Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence series, published by Springer. -The IF scores were calculated in Scopus as follows: (Cites in 2006 to articles published in 2005 + Cites in 2006 to articles published in 2004) divided by Number of articles published in 2004-2005. Unique citations found through the 'More' tab/search feature were accounted for in the IF calculations. We used Scopus instead of Thomson Scientific Journal Citation Reports ( JCR ) because the latter covers only 18 of the 42 sources in question in comparison to 34 in Scopus. We could not calculate the impact factor for eight conference proceedings because of coverage irregularities by Scopus and/or because some proceedings are published once every two years instead of annually. The correlation between IF scores in JCR and those in Scopus of the 18 titles commonly covered by both sources was found to be statistically significant with Spearman rank order correlation coefficient of 0.876. *2007 IF. **2004 IF. Table
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals?
Ghane, M. R. (2016) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1000 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2008
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 0803.1716
- OpenAlex
- W2949777493
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Hispana (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- citation counting, citation ranking, h-index, Scopus, Web of Science, bibliographic database coverage, citation networks, research evaluation, Google Scholar, equator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
