The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010 · Paper page
Abstract
This paper proposes scalable and fast algorithms for solving the Robust PCA problem, namely recovering a low-rank matrix with an unknown fraction of its entries being arbitrarily corrupted. This problem arises in many applications, such as image processing, web data ranking, and bioinformatic data analysis. It was recently shown that under surprisingly broad conditions, the Robust PCA problem can be exactly solved via convex optimization that minimizes a combination of the nuclear norm and the $\ell^1$-norm . In this paper, we apply the method of augmented Lagrange multipliers (ALM) to solve this convex program. As the objective function is non-smooth, we show how to extend the classical analysis of ALM to such new objective functions and prove the optimality of the proposed algorithms and characterize their convergence rate. Empirically, the proposed new algorithms can be more than five times faster than the previous state-of-the-art algorithms for Robust PCA, such as the accelerated proximal gradient (APG) algorithm. Moreover, the new algorithms achieve higher precision, yet being less storage/memory demanding. We also show that the ALM technique can be used to solve the (related but somewhat simpler) matrix completion problem and obtain rather promising results too. We further prove the necessary and sufficient condition for the inexact ALM to converge globally. Matlab code of all algorithms discussed are available at http://perception.csl.illinois.edu/matrix-rank/home.html
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restoration
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Gu, S., & Zhang, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.300 · Cited by 2,116
Tensor Completion for Estimating Missing Values in Visual Data
Liu, J., Musialski, P., Wonka, P., & Ye, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.39 · Cited by 2,063
Adamson, B., Norman, T. M., Jost, M., Cho, M. Y., Nuñez, J. K., Chen, Y., Villalta, J. E., Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Hein, M. Y., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048 · Cited by 1,193
Multiview Clustering: A Scalable and Parameter-Free Bipartite Graph Fusion Method
Li, X., Zhang, H., Wang, R., & Nie, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3011148 · Cited by 499
Yang, J., Luo, L., Qian, J., Tai, Y., Zhang, F., & Xu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2535218 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Z., Chen, M., & Ma, Y.
- Venue
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2010
- arXiv
- 1009.5055
- OpenAlex
- W6929385289
- Cited by
- 1,176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1009.5055
- The paper
- Lin, Z., Chen, M., & Ma, Y. (2010). The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1009.5055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.