The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiview Clustering: A Scalable and Parameter-Free Bipartite Graph Fusion Method
Abstract
Multiview clustering partitions data into different groups according to their heterogeneous features. Most existing methods degenerate the applicability of models due to their intractable hyper-parameters triggered by various regularization terms. Moreover, traditional spectral based methods always encounter the expensive time overheads and fail in exploring the explicit clusters from graphs. In this paper, we present a scalable and parameter-free graph fusion framework for multiview clustering, seeking for a joint graph compatible across multiple views in a self-supervised weighting manner. Our formulation coalesces multiple view-wise graphs straightforward and learns the weights as well as the joint graph interactively, which could actively release the model from any weight-related hyper-parameters. Meanwhile, we manipulate the joint graph by a connectivity constraint such that the connected components indicate clusters directly. The designed algorithm is initialization-independent and time-economical which obtains the stable performance and scales well with the data size. Substantial experiments on toy data as well as real datasets are conducted that verify the superiority of the proposed method compared to the state-of-the-arts over the clustering performance and time expenditure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,156
Normalized cuts and image segmentation
Shi, J., & Malik, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.868688 · Cited by 15,502
The Hungarian method for the assignment problem
Kuhn, H. W. (1955) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800020109 · Cited by 13,120
Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means
Jain, A. K. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 · Cited by 9,368
The MNIST Database of Handwritten Digit Images for Machine Learning Research [Best of the Web]
Deng, L. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2211477 · Cited by 4,836
Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10366-2 · Cited by 4,016
NUS-WIDE: a real-world web image database from National University of Singapore
Chua, T.-S., Tang, J., Hong, R., Li, H., Luo, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval · doi:10.1145/1646396.1646452 · Cited by 3,025
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2005.09.012 · Cited by 2,359
Convergence of a Block Coordinate Descent Method for Nondifferentiable Minimization
Tseng, P. (2001) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1023/a:1017501703105 · Cited by 1,989
The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices
Lin, Z., Chen, M., & Ma, Y. (2010) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1009.5055 · Cited by 1,176
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Zhang, H., Wang, R., & Nie, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 330-344
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W3044063956
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiview Clustering: A Scalable and Parameter-Free Bipartite Graph Fusion Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2020.3011148
- The paper
- Li, X., Zhang, H., Wang, R., & Nie, F. (2022). Multiview Clustering: A Scalable and Parameter-Free Bipartite Graph Fusion Method. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2020.3011148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.