The DOI matches its DataCite record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper" -- A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction using Twitter Data
Open accessAbstract
Predicting X from Twitter is a popular fad within the Twitter research subculture. It seems both appealing and relatively easy. Among such kind of studies, electoral prediction is maybe the most attractive, and at this moment there is a growing body of literature on such a topic. This is not only an interesting research problem but, above all, it is extremely difficult. However, most of the authors seem to be more interested in claiming positive results than in providing sound and reproducible methods. It is also especially worrisome that many recent papers seem to only acknowledge those studies supporting the idea of Twitter predicting elections, instead of conducting a balanced literature review showing both sides of the matter. After reading many of such papers I have decided to write such a survey myself. Hence, in this paper, every study relevant to the matter of electoral prediction using social media is commented. From this review it can be concluded that the predictive power of Twitter regarding elections has been greatly exaggerated, and that hard research problems still lie ahead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“publications of negative results are scant (Gayo-Avello, 2012; Ruths and Pfeffer, 2014).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Gayo-Avello, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,647
Information credibility on twitter
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500 · Cited by 2,593
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series
O'Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B., & Smith, N. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14031 · Cited by 1,949
Political Polarization on Twitter
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4589064 · Cited by 1,254
Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Pepe, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14171 · Cited by 936
Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users
Mislove, A. E., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y., Onnela, J.-P. “., & Rosenquist, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14168 · Cited by 761
Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users
Conover, M. D., Goncalves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.34 · Cited by 588
Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media
Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14127 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
“, 2015b; Pavalanathan and Eisenstein, 2015), or exit pools or election results (Gayo-Avello et al., 2011; Gayo-Avello, 2012; Gayo-Avello, 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Understanding the Political Representativeness of Twitter Users
Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2014) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314558836 · Cited by 394
Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Burnap, P., & Williams, M. L. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115545 · Cited by 388
Martínez‐Cámara, E., Valdivia, M. T. M., López, L. A. U., & Montejo‐Ráez, A. (2012) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324912000332 · Cited by 349
More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079449 · Cited by 354
The Twitter of babel: mapping world languages through microblogging platforms
Mocanu, D., Baronchelli, A., Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Zhang, Q., & Vespignani, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061981 · Cited by 293
Early Prediction of Movie Box Office Success Based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data
Mestyán, M., Yasseri, T., & Kertész, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071226 · Cited by 284
Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets
Mohammad, S. M., Zhu, X., Kiritchenko, S., & Martin, J. (2014) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.09.003 · Cited by 274
Sloan, L., & Morgan, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142209 · Cited by 279
The emergence of social media data and sentiment analysis in election prediction
Chauhan, P., Sharma, N., & Sikka, G. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02423-y · Cited by 242
140 characters to victory?: Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 General Election
Burnap, P., Gibson, R., Sloan, L., Southern, R., & Williams, M. L. (2015) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.017 · Cited by 212
Knowing the Tweeters: Deriving Sociologically Relevant Demographics from Twitter
Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Housley, W., Williams, M. L., Edwards, A., Burnap, P., & RANA, O. F. (2013) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.3001 · Cited by 197
Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Data
Wang, Z., Hale, S. A., Adelani, D. I., Grabowicz, P. A., Hartman, T., Flöck, F., & Jurgens, D. (2019) · Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) · doi:10.22028/d291-29212 · Cited by 190
Three maps and three misunderstandings: A digital mapping of climate diplomacy
Venturini, T., Baya-Laffite, N., Cointet, J., Gray, I., Zabban, V., & Pryck, K. D. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714543804 · Cited by 178
Twitter Usage in IndonesiaPreprint
Carley, K. M., Malik, M. M., Landwehr, P. M., Pfeffer, J., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.04.002 · Cited by 236
Adapting sentiment lexicons to domain-specific social media texts
Deng, S., Sinha, A. P., & Zhao, H. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.11.001 · Cited by 139
Online and Social Media Data As an Imperfect Continuous Panel Survey
Diaz, F., Gamon, M., Hofman, J. M., Kıcıman, E., & Rothschild, D. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145406 · Cited by 131
The dynamics of information-driven coordination phenomena: A transfer entropy analysis
Borge‐Holthoefer, J., Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., González-Bailón, S., Arenas, À., Moreno, Y., & Vespignani, A. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501158 · Cited by 110
Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum
Grćar, M., Cherepnalkoski, D., Mozetič, I., & Novak, P. K. (2017) · Computational Social Networks · doi:10.1186/s40649-017-0042-6 · Cited by 104
Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: A collaborative response
Housley, W., Procter, R., Edwards, A., Burnap, P., Williams, M. L., Sloan, L., RANA, O. F., Morgan, J., Alex Voss, L., & Greenhill, A. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714545135 · Cited by 98
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of Human Behavior on Online Platforms
Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., & Wagner, C. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab018 · Cited by 138
A Multi-Level Geographical Study of Italian Political Elections from Twitter Data
Caldarelli, G., Chessa, A., Fabio Pammolli, A., Pompa, G., Puliga, M., Riccaboni, M., & Riotta, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095809 · Cited by 87
Characterizing Silent Users in Social Media Communities
Gong, W., Lim, E., & Zhu, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14582 · Cited by 85
Mohammad, S. M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821124-3.00011-9 · Cited by 101
Social media prediction: a literature review
Rousidis, D., Koukaras, P., & Tjortjis, C. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-08291-9 · Cited by 82
Oliveira, D. J. S., Bermejo, P. H. D. S., & dos Santos, P. A. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2016.1214094 · Cited by 79
Beating the news using social media: the case study of American Idol
Ciulla, F., Mocanu, D., Baronchelli, A., Gonçalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2012) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds8 · Cited by 78
Sloan, L. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117698981 · Cited by 75
Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media
Huberty, M. (2015) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.005 · Cited by 73
Leveraging candidate popularity on Twitter to predict election outcome
Gaurav, M., Srivastava, A. K., Kumar, A., & Miller, S. (2013) · Social Network Mining and Analysis · doi:10.1145/2501025.2501038 · Cited by 69
Perils and Challenges of Social Media and Election Manipulation Analysis: The 2018 US Midterms
Deb, A., Luceri, L., Badaway, A., & Ferrara, E. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316486 · Cited by 71
Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz?
Murthy, D. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1006659 · Cited by 67
Social Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media
Yang, X., Chen, B.-C., Maity, M., & Ferrara, E. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_20 · Cited by 69
Facebook likes and public opinion: Predicting the 2015 Finnish parliamentary elections
Vepsäläinen, T., Li, H., & Suomi, R. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.004 · Cited by 65
Awaiting the Second Big Data Revolution: From Digital Noise to Value Creation
Huberty, M. (2015) · Journal of Industry Competition and Trade · doi:10.1007/s10842-014-0190-4 · Cited by 59
Predicting Elections from Social Networks Based on Sub-event Detection and Sentiment Analysis
Unankard, S., Li, X., Sharaf, M. A., Zhong, J., & Li, X. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11746-1_1 · Cited by 58
Baghal, T. A., Sloan, L., Jessop, C., Williams, M. L., & Burnap, P. (2019) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439319828011 · Cited by 57
Jungherr, A. M., & Jürgens, P. (2013) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2012-0115 · Cited by 57
Twitter Mining for Discovery, Prediction and Causality: Applications and Methodologies
O’Leary, D. E. (2015) · Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management · doi:10.1002/isaf.1376 · Cited by 57
Understanding Information Credibility on Twitter
Sikdar, S., Kang, B., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T., & Adah, S. (2013) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2013.9 · Cited by 55
Predicting political sentiments of voters from Twitter in multi-party contexts
Khatua, A., Khatua, A., & Cambria, E. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106743 · Cited by 54
Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media
García, D., Mendez, F., Serdült, U., & Schweitzer, F. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2389661.2389665 · Cited by 47
Can Online Emotions Predict the Stock Market in China?
Zhou, Z., Zhao, J., & Xu, K. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48740-3_24 · Cited by 51
Can We Forecast Presidential Election Using Twitter Data? An Integrative Modelling Approach
Liu, R., Yao, X. A., Guo, C., & Wei, X. (2020) · Annals of GIS · doi:10.1080/19475683.2020.1829704 · Cited by 51
Tweets and votes, a special relationship
Jungherr, A. M. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2508436.2508437 · Cited by 50
Using Social Media to Predict the Future: A Systematic Literature Review
Phillips, L., Dowling, C., Shaffer, K., Hodas, N. O., & Volkova, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.06134 · Cited by 76
Making sense of digital traces: An activity theory driven ontological approach
Karanasios, S., Thakker, D., Lau, L., Allen, D. T., Dimitrova, V. G., & Norman, A. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22935 · Cited by 48
Lin, Y., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488453 · Cited by 48
Twitter-Based Analysis of the Dynamics of Collective Attention to Political Parties
Eom, Y.-H., Puliga, M., Smailović, J., Mozetič, I., & Caldarelli, G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131184 · Cited by 48
Monitoring the Twitter sentiment during the Bulgarian elections
Smailović, J., Kranjc, J., Grćar, M., Žnidaršič, M., & Mozetič, I. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2015.7344886 · Cited by 46
US Presidential Election 2012 Prediction using Census Corrected Twitter ModelPreprint
Choy, M., Cheong, M. L. F., Laik, M. N., & Shung, K. P. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.0938 · Cited by 45
Twitter Population Sample Bias and its impact on predictive outcomes
Filho, R. M., Almeida, J. M., & Pappa, G. L. (2015) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/2808797.2809328 · Cited by 42
Venturini, T., Cardon, D., & Cointet, J. (2015) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.188.0009 · Cited by 42
Can #Twitter_Trends Predict Election Results? Evidence from 2014 Indian General Election
Khatua, A., Khatua, A., Ghosh, K., & Chaki, N. (2015) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2015.202 · Cited by 41
A Biased Review of Biases in Twitter Studies on Political Collective Action
Cihon, P., & Yasseri, T. (2016) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2016.00034 · Cited by 46
Tales of emotion and stock in China: volatility, causality and prediction
Zhou, Z., Xu, K., & Zhao, J. (2017) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-017-0495-4 · Cited by 39
Brute force effects of mass media presence and social media activity on electoral outcome
Kovic, M., Rauchfleisch, A., Metag, J., Caspar, C., & Szenogrady, J. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1374228 · Cited by 33
Generalizing from social media data: a formal theory approach
Davis, J. L., & Love, T. P. (2018) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1555610 · Cited by 33
Kang, X., Shi, X., Wu, Y., & Ren, F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3038401 · Cited by 33
Changes in Twitter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usage
Kruspe, A., Häberle, M., Hoffmann, E. J., Rode-Hasinger, S., Abdulahhad, K., & Zhu, X. X. (2021) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.24 · Cited by 34
Improved Twitter Sentiment Prediction through Cluster-then-Predict ModelPreprint
Soni, R., & Mathai, K. (2015) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02437 · Cited by 22
Revisiting The American Voter on Twitter
Le, H., Boynton, G. R., Mejova, Y., Shafiq, Z., & Srinivasan, P. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025543 · Cited by 31
Forecasting the 2016 US Presidential Elections Using Sentiment Analysis
Singh, P., Sawhney, R. S., & Kahlon, K. S. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_36 · Cited by 31
Cossu, J.-V., Labatut, V., & Dugué, N. (2016) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0329-x · Cited by 31
Can electoral popularity be predicted using socially generated big data?
Yasseri, T., & Bright, J. (2014) · it - Information Technology · doi:10.1515/itit-2014-1046 · Cited by 29
India 2014: Facebook ‘Like’ as a Predictor of Election Outcomes
Barclay, F. P., Pichandy, C., Venkat, A., & Sudhakaran, S. (2015) · Asian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/02185377.2015.1020319 · Cited by 29
Leveraging big data for politics: predicting general election of Pakistan using a novel rigged model
Awais, M., Hassan, S., & Ahmed, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-019-01378-z · Cited by 27
Preaching to the choir: ideology and following behaviour in social media
Rivero, G. (2019) · Contemporary Social Science · doi:10.1080/21582041.2017.1325924 · Cited by 26
Margolin, D. (2019) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2019.1639144 · Cited by 27
Twitter als Basis wissenschaftlicher Studien
Pfaffenberger, F. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14414-2 · Cited by 24
Chen, L., Wang, W., & Sheth, A. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_28 · Cited by 24
Predicting Brexit: Classifying Agreement is Better than Sentiment and Pollsters
Celli, F., Stepanov, E. A., Poesio, M., & Riccardi, G. (2016) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 23
Ant colony based approach to predict stock market movement from mood collected on Twitter
Bouktif, S., & Awad, M. (2013) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/2492517.2500282 · Cited by 23
Kwak, J.-A., & Cho, S. K. (2018) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.15206/ajpor.2018.5.4.285 · Cited by 23
Guerrero-Solé, F., Corominas‐Murtra, B., & López-González, H. (2014) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.920040 · Cited by 24
Los Twindignados: The Rise of the Indignados Movement on Twitter
Vallina-Rodríguez, N., Scellato, S., Haddadi, H., Forsell, C., Crowcroft, J., & Cecilia Mascolo, C. (2012) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.120 · Cited by 21
It Is an Equal Failing to Trust Everybody and to Trust Nobody
Huang, T.-C., Zaeem, R. N., & Barber, K. S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · doi:10.1145/3338855 · Cited by 21
Wang, Q., & Taylor, J. E. (2014) · Procedia Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00910-1 · Cited by 20
POPmine: Tracking Political Opinion on the Web
Saleiro, P., Amir, S., Silva, M. J., & Soares, C. (2015) · doi:10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.228 · Cited by 20
New data sources for social indicators: the case study of contacting politicians by Twitter
Sánchez, C. R., Craglia, M., & Bregt, A. K. (2016) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2016.1259361 · Cited by 20
Le, H., Boynton, G. R., Mejova, Y., Shafiq, Z., & Srinivasan, P. (2017) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3078714.3078736 · Cited by 20
Reveilhac, M., & Morselli, D. (2022) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12543 · Cited by 19
Attarwala, A., Dimitrov, S., & Obeidi, A. (2017) · Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) · doi:10.1109/intellisys.2017.8324363 · Cited by 19
Miller, N. W., & Ko, R. S. (2015) · International journal of communication · Cited by 18
Social media popularity and election results: A study of the 2016 Taiwanese general election
Zhang, X. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208190 · Cited by 18
A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of HumansPreprint
Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., & Wagner, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 20
Mancosu, M., & Bobba, G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211013 · Cited by 18
An Opinion Mining for Indian Premier League Using Machine Learning Techniques
Arti, Dubey, K. P., & Agrawal, S. (2019) · International Conference on Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU) · doi:10.1109/iot-siu.2019.8777472 · Cited by 16
Identifying purpose behind electoral tweets
Mohammad, S. M., Kiritchenko, S., & Martin, J. (2013) · International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining (WISDOM) · doi:10.1145/2502069.2502070 · Cited by 15
Borrelli, D., Iandoli, L., Ramírez-Márquez, J. E., & Lipizzi, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3094775 · Cited by 20
Sentiment Aggregate Functions for Political Opinion Polling using Microblog Streams
Saleiro, P., Gomes, L., & Soares, C. (2016) · International C* Conference on Computer Science & Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2948992.2949022 · Cited by 14
de Souza, R. M., da Graça, L. F. G., & Silva, R. S. (2017) · Brazilian Political Science Review · doi:10.1590/1981-3821201700030003 · Cited by 6
Lurking and L2 Learners on a Facebook Group: The Voices of the Invisibles
Shafie, L. A., Yaacob, A., & Singh, P. K. K. (2016) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v9n2p1 · Cited by 14
Towards Passive Political Opinion Polling using Twitter.
Thapen, N., & Ghanem, M. M. (2013) · Cited by 13
Franco-Riquelme, J. N., Bello-García, A., & Ordieres-Meré, J. B. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917398 · Cited by 12
Campanale, M., & Caldarola, E. G. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508243 · Cited by 11
Critical states in Political Trends. How much reliable is a poll on Twitter?
Nicolao, L., & Ostilli, M. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.121920 · Cited by 11
Challenges to representing the population from new forms of consumer data
Lansley, G., & Cheshire, J. (2018) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12374 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gayo-Avello, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Gayo-Avello, Daniel
- ORCID
- Gayo-Avello, Daniel
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2012
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1204.6441
- OpenAlex
- W2106934621
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- election forecasting, Twitter, social media, predictive power, reproducibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
