PreprintCited by 4Cooperative Communication and Network CodingWireless Communication Security TechniquesCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing

Bounds and Capacity Theorems for Cognitive Interference Channels with State

Open access
Liang, Ruchen Duan Yingbin·2012·arXiv

Abstract

A class of cognitive interference channel with state is investigated, in which two transmitters (transmitters 1 and 2) communicate with two receivers (receivers 1 and 2) over an interference channel. The two transmitters jointly transmit a common message to the two receivers, and transmitter 2 also sends a separate message to receiver 2. The channel is corrupted by an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) state sequence. The scenario in which the state sequence is noncausally known only at transmitter 2 is first studied. For the discrete memoryless channel and its degraded version, inner and outer bounds on the capacity region are obtained. The capacity region is characterized for the degraded semideterministic channel and channels that satisfy a less noisy condition. The Gaussian channels are further studied, which are partitioned into two cases based on how the interference compares with the signal at receiver 1. For each case, inner and outer bounds on the capacity region are derived, and partial boundary of the capacity region is characterized. The full capacity region is characterized for channels that satisfy certain conditions. The second scenario in which the state sequence is noncausally known at both transmitter 2 and receiver 2 is further studied. The capacity region is obtained for both the discrete memoryless and Gaussian channels. It is also shown that this capacity is achieved by certain Gaussian channels with state noncausally known only at transmitter 2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1207.0016

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our causal fairness definition is designed specifically to be testable, unlike definitions that require probabilistic estimation or knowledge of the future.

    “Our causal fairness definition is designed specifically to be testable, unlike definitions that require probabilistic estimation or knowledge of the future [38].”

    From Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination (2017) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, R. D. Y.
Corresponding author
Liang, Ruchen Duan Yingbin
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167055644
Cited by
3
References
24
Citations by year
2014: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CAREER)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cooperative Communication and Network Coding
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Keywords
cognitive interference channel, channel state information, non-causal state information, capacity region, Gaussian interference channel, discrete memoryless channels, inner and outer bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review