The DOI matches its DataCite record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Open accessAbstract
We propose two novel model architectures for computing continuous vector representations of words from very large data sets. The quality of these representations is measured in a word similarity task, and the results are compared to the previously best performing techniques based on different types of neural networks. We observe large improvements in accuracy at much lower computational cost, i.e. it takes less than a day to learn high quality word vectors from a 1.6 billion words data set. Furthermore, we show that these vectors provide state-of-the-art performance on our test set for measuring syntactic and semantic word similarities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even during this stage, there was some use of pre-trained LMs exemplified by word2vec[85,86] and GloVe[95], but they were used for only a limited portion of the final model parameters.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Word embeddings are created using a model proposed by Mikolov et al. (2013), developed by Google.”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“According to Mikolov et al. (2013), if 'closeness' is measured by cosine similarity, the vector V ( w 3 ) is most similar to the vector V ( w 0 ) -V ( w 1 ) + V ( w 2 ) .”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Models can undergo training on extensive textual datasets, subsequently utilizing the acquired knowledge for subsequent tasks through transfer learning (Mikolov et al. 2013).”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Distributed word representations can be created quickly using shallow networks, such as the Continuous Bag-of-Words (CBOW) model [19].”
From Automatic Speech Recognition With Very Large Conversational Finnish and Estonian Vocabularies (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This form of Test-Time Training (TTT), similar to an old idea known as dynamic evaluation [72, 60], still has a missing piece: At training time, we were optimizing the model for its loss out of the box, not for its loss after TTT.”
From End-to-End Test-Time Training for Long Context (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Word2Vec has experienced significant growth in NLP in recent years (Mikolov et al. 2013).”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
Recurrent neural network based language model
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010) · Interspeech 2010 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-343 · Cited by 5,390
Self-citationA unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks
Dean, J. B., Corrado, G. S., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M., Senior, A., Tucker, P. A., Yang, K., et al. (2012) · Cited by 3,202
Self-citationLinguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Self-citation(2010) · Cited by 1,906
Extensions of recurrent neural network language model
Mikolov, T., Kombrink, S., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. P. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2011.5947611 · Cited by 1,622
Self-citation(2007) · Cited by 937
A Scalable Hierarchical Distributed Language Model
Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. E. (2008) · Cited by 843
Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection
Socher, R., Huang, E., Pennin, J., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y. (2011) · Cited by 785
Large Language Models in Machine Translation
Brants, T., Popat, A. C., Xu, P., Och, F. J., & Dean, J. B. (2007) · Cited by 574
Self-citationThree new graphical models for statistical language modelling
Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. E. (2007) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273577 · Cited by 569
Continuous space language models
Schwenk, H. (2006) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2006.09.003 · Cited by 531
A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Training Neural Probabilistic Language Models
Mnih, A., & Teh, Y. W. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.6426 · Cited by 315
Empirical evaluation and combination of advanced language modeling techniques
Mikolov, T., Deoras, A., Kombrink, S., Burget, L., & Černocký, J. (2011) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2011-242 · Cited by 278
Self-citationSemEval-2012 Task 2 : measuring degrees of relational similarity
Jurgens, D., Turney, P. D., Mohammad, S. M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012) · NPARC · Cited by 182
Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
Turney, P. D. (2005) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0508053 · Cited by 167
The Microsoft Research Sentence Completion Challenge
Zweig, G., & Burges, C. J. C. (2011) · Cited by 71
Combining Heterogeneous Models for Measuring Relational Similarity
Zhila, A., Yih, W.-T., Meek, C., Zweig, G., & Mikolov, T. (2013) · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1][1] Y. Bengio, R. Ducharme, P. Vincent. A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1137-1155, 2003. -
- [5][5] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu and P. Kuksa. Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:24932537, 2011. -
- [9][9] Eric H. Huang, R. Socher, C. D. Manning and Andrew Y. Ng. Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes. In: Proc. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. -
- [10][10] G.E. Hinton, J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart. Distributed representations. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations, MIT Press, 1986. -
- [13][13] T. Mikolov. Language Modeling for Speech Recognition in Czech, Masters thesis, Brno University of Technology, 2007. -
- [14][14] T. Mikolov, J. Kopeck´ y, L. Burget, O. Glembek and J. ˇ Cernock´ y. Neural network based language models for higly inflective languages, In: Proc. ICASSP 2009. -
- [18][18] T. Mikolov, A. Deoras, D. Povey, L. Burget, J. ˇ Cernock´ y. Strategies for Training Large Scale Neural Network Language Models, In: Proc. Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, 2011. -
- [19][19] T. Mikolov. Statistical Language Models based on Neural Networks. PhD thesis, Brno University of Technology, 2012. -
- [21][21] T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Accepted to NIPS 2013. -
- [25][25] F. Morin, Y. Bengio. Hierarchical Probabilistic Neural Network Language Model. AISTATS, 2005. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Self-citationLanguage Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1301.3781
- OpenAlex
- W1614298861
- Cited by
- 26,568
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 160 · 2025: 1031 · 2024: 1852 · 2023: 2491 · 2022: 2436 · 2021: 3947 · 2020: 3679 · 2019: 3494 · 2018: 2934 · 2017: 1991 · 2016: 1405 · 2015: 853 · 2014: 254 · 2013: 32
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- word embeddings, word representation learning, word similarity, computational efficiency, syntactic similarity, semantic similarity, neural network architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
