The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang
Open accessAbstract
While most of the singularities of General Relativity are expected to be safely hidden behind event horizons by the cosmic censorship conjecture, we happen to live in the causal future of the classical big bang singularity, whose resolution constitutes the active field of early universe cosmology. Could the big bang be also hidden behind a causal horizon, making us immune to the decadent impacts of a naked singularity? We describe a braneworld description of cosmology with both 4d induced and 5d bulk gravity (otherwise known as Dvali-Gabadadze-Porati, or DGP model), which exhibits this feature: The universe emerges as a spherical 3-brane out of the formation of a 5d Schwarzschild black hole. In particular, we show that a pressure singularity of the holographic fluid, discovered earlier, happens inside the white hole horizon, and thus need not be real or imply any pathology. Furthermore, we outline a novel mechanism through which any thermal atmosphere for the brane, with comoving temperature of 20% of the 5D Planck mass can induce scale-invariant primordial curvature perturbations on the brane, circumventing the need for a separate process (such as cosmic inflation) to explain current cosmological observations. Finally, we note that 5D space-time is asymptotically flat, and thus potentially allows an S-matrix or (after minor modifications) AdS/CFT description of the cosmological big bang.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cosmological Perturbations in the 5D Holographic Big Bang Model
Altamirano, N., Gould, E., Afshordi, N., & Mann, R. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00954 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pourhasan, R., Afshordi, N., & Mann, R. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 005-005
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1309.1487
- OpenAlex
- W2086985373
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Government of Canada
- Industry Canada
- University of Waterloo
- Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- initial singularity, white holes, cosmic censorship, naked singularities, brane cosmology, DGP model, braneworld gravity, holographic fluid, Schwarzschild black hole, AdS/CFT correspondence, scattering matrix, early universe cosmology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review