The DOI matches its DataCite record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Open accessAbstract
The recently introduced continuous Skip-gram model is an efficient method for learning high-quality distributed vector representations that capture a large number of precise syntactic and semantic word relationships. In this paper we present several extensions that improve both the quality of the vectors and the training speed. By subsampling of the frequent words we obtain significant speedup and also learn more regular word representations. We also describe a simple alternative to the hierarchical softmax called negative sampling. An inherent limitation of word representations is their indifference to word order and their inability to represent idiomatic phrases. For example, the meanings of "Canada" and "Air" cannot be easily combined to obtain "Air Canada". Motivated by this example, we present a simple method for finding phrases in text, and show that learning good vector representations for millions of phrases is possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Earlier word embedding models, e.g., word2vec [60] and GloVe [61], predominantly relied on syntactic contexts for training.”
From A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Speech, Text, and Face (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Contrary to string similarity-based approaches, continuous word representations capture not only lexical but also semantic properties of tokens.”
From A Method for the Calculation of Parallel Passages for Buddhist Chinese Sources Based on Million-scale Nearest Neighbor Search (2020) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. (2013)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mikolov et al. (2013) demonstrated that unweighted averaging of word embeddings performs well for the representation of short phrases.”
From A Method for the Calculation of Parallel Passages for Buddhist Chinese Sources Based on Million-scale Nearest Neighbor Search (2020) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. (2013)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even during this stage, there was some use of pre-trained LMs exemplified by word2vec[85,86] and GloVe[95], but they were used for only a limited portion of the final model parameters.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [86]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These models were trained on vast amounts of unlabeled data, aiming to capture intricate grammatical and semantic rules.”
From A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Speech, Text, and Face (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the next steps we filter out stopwords (e. g. 'a' , 'and' , 'the') and build a Word2Vec model (Mikolov et al., 2013) from these queries to get a model of the occurrence and co-occurrence of terms in these queries.”
From AI art in architecture (2023) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al., 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Negative sampling has been proved quite effective for both learning knowledge graph embedding (Trouillon et al., 2016) and word embedding (Mikolov et al., 2013).”
From RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Space (2019) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Self-citationA unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics
Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2934 · Cited by 2,949
Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Self-citation(2010) · Cited by 1,906
Extensions of recurrent neural network language model
Mikolov, T., Kombrink, S., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. P. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2011.5947611 · Cited by 1,622
Self-citationDomain Adaptation for Large-Scale Sentiment Classification: A Deep Learning Approach
Glorot, X., Bordes, A., & Bengio, Y. (2011) · Cited by 1,569
Semantic Compositionality through Recursive Matrix-Vector Spaces
Socher, R., Huval, B., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y. (2012) · Cited by 1,262
(2011) · Cited by 1,192
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [1][1] Yoshua Bengio, R´ ejean Ducharme, Pascal Vincent, and Christian Janvin. A neural probabilistic language model. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 3:1137-1155, 2003. -
- [7][7] Tomas Mikolov. Statistical Language Models Based on Neural Networks. PhD thesis, PhD Thesis, Brno University of Technology , 2012. -
- [13][13] David E Rumelhart, Geoffrey E Hintont, and Ronald J Williams. Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature , 323(6088):533-536, 1986. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 3111-3119
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1310.4546
- OpenAlex
- W2153579005
- Cited by
- 24,533
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 114 · 2025: 872 · 2024: 1388 · 2023: 1965 · 2022: 2239 · 2021: 3514 · 2020: 3787 · 2019: 3870 · 2018: 2785 · 2017: 1949 · 2016: 1194 · 2015: 658 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- distributed word representations, skip-gram model, phrase representation, negative sampling, frequent terms, idioms, word order, training speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review