PreprintCited by 21Topic Modelingscientometrics and bibliometrics researchNatural Language Processing Techniques

Learning Soft Linear Constraints with Application to Citation Field Extraction

Open access
Anzaroot, Sam, Passos, Alexandre, Belanger, David, McCallum, Andrew·2014·arXiv

Abstract

Accurately segmenting a citation string into fields for authors, titles, etc. is a challenging task because the output typically obeys various global constraints. Previous work has shown that modeling soft constraints, where the model is encouraged, but not require to obey the constraints, can substantially improve segmentation performance. On the other hand, for imposing hard constraints, dual decomposition is a popular technique for efficient prediction given existing algorithms for unconstrained inference. We extend the technique to perform prediction subject to soft constraints. Moreover, with a technique for performing inference given soft constraints, it is easy to automatically generate large families of constraints and learn their costs with a simple convex optimization problem during training. This allows us to obtain substantial gains in accuracy on a new, challenging citation extraction dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1403.1349

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Purely rule-based extraction is often brittle and difficult to scale across bibliography styles, and learning-based approaches such as soft-constrained citation field extractors trained on the UMass Citations corpus still leave residual character-level errors that propagate into downstream verification.

    “As a result, purely rule-based extraction is often brittle and difficult to scale across bibliography styles, and learning-based approaches such as soft-constrained citation field extractors trained on the UMass Citations corpus [4, 3] still leave residual character-level errors that propagate into downstream verification.”

    From Source or It Didn't Happen: A Multi-Agent Framework for Citation Hallucination Detection (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. In Information Fusion (FUSION), 2012 15th Inter- national Conference on, pages 231-238. IEEE.
  2. Michael J Paul and Jason Eisner. 2012. Implicitly in- tersecting weighted automata using dual decompo- sition. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, pages 232-242. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.
  3. Alexander M Rush, Roi Reichart, Michael Collins, and Amir Globerson. 2012. Improved parsing and pos tagging using inter-sentence consistency constraints. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1434-1444.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anzaroot, S., Passos, A., Belanger, D., & McCallum, A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
Pages
593-602
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964269754
Cited by
20
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0958392)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0020, FA8750)
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
dual decomposition, constrained inference, constraint learning, convex optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review