The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models
Open accessAbstract
The stochastic multi-armed bandit model is a simple abstraction that has proven useful in many different contexts in statistics and machine learning. Whereas the achievable limit in terms of regret minimization is now well known, our aim is to contribute to a better understanding of the performance in terms of identifying the m best arms. We introduce generic notions of complexity for the two dominant frameworks considered in the literature: fixed-budget and fixed-confidence settings. In the fixed-confidence setting, we provide the first known distribution-dependent lower bound on the complexity that involves information-theoretic quantities and holds when m is larger than 1 under general assumptions. In the specific case of two armed-bandits, we derive refined lower bounds in both the fixed-confidence and fixed-budget settings, along with matching algorithms for Gaussian and Bernoulli bandit models. These results show in particular that the complexity of the fixed-budget setting may be smaller than the complexity of the fixed-confidence setting, contradicting the familiar behavior observed when testing fully specified alternatives. In addition, we also provide improved sequential stopping rules that have guaranteed error probabilities and shorter average running times. The proofs rely on two technical results that are of independent interest : a deviation lemma for self-normalized sums (Lemma 19) and a novel change of measure inequality for bandit models (Lemma 1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Fischer, P. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1013689704352 · Cited by 6,033
THOMPSON, W. R. (1933) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/25.3-4.285 · Cited by 2,712
Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments
Robbins, H. (1952) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1952-09620-8 · Cited by 2,184
Cited by
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1249 · Cited by 3,103
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizons
Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2962027 · Cited by 897
Explainable AI: A Brief Survey on History, Research Areas, Approaches and Challenges
Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., Du, Y., Fan, W., Zhao, D., & Zhu, J. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32236-6_51 · Cited by 758
An Efficient Deep Learning Approach to Pneumonia Classification in Healthcare
Stephen, O., Sain, M., Maduh, U. J., & Jeong, D.-U. (2019) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2019/4180949 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufmann, E., Cappé, O., & Garivier, A.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1407.4443
- OpenAlex
- W1506859583
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1407.4443
- The paper
- Kaufmann, E., Cappé, O., & Garivier, A. (2014). On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1407.4443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.